Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2617
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A/HRC/47/9: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Lucia
United Nations A/HRC/47/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/9https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc479-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-lucia
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
Alakuş v. Türkiye
Alaku v. T rkiye CCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020 Communication number s : 3736/2020 Author: Mukadder Alaku Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country T rkiye Submission date 23 Dec 2019 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3737/en-US
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 10/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference by a Customs Department order closing the applicant company duty free business located inside the Leu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6778
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY 9042/04 BERGE H. NOR 5/31/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY Application no. 9042/04 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 31 May 2007 FINAL ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80744
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.B.V. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B.V. v. RUSSIA 56987/15 THREEFOLD LEGAL ADVISORS LLC RUS 10/2/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD005698715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186439
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA 1439/06 BELINSKAYA M. RUS 10/14/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage award Article 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 350 90 193 448 220 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD000143906https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100964
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28680/06 MOLE N. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 8 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage award Section 23 6 of the Children Act 1989 238 354 444 110 451 268 376 425 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD002868006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97636