Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2499
A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom
A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom GBR 31/10/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private: Prohibition by law of homosexual acts between several consenting men in private and conviction of the applicant for gross indecency in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2540
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
ALIEV v. Ukraine
ALIEV v. Ukraine UKR 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/conditions of detention protection of private and family life/freedom of religion and lack of a remedy: poor conditions of detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31304
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012 Communication number s : 2227/2012 Author: Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2135/en-US
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan
Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012 Communication number s : 2227/2012 Author: Akmurat Halbayewich Yegendurdyyew Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2227/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2179/en-US
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 10/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference by a Customs Department order closing the applicant company duty free business located inside the Leu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6778
BOYADZHIEVA AND GLORIA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED EOOD v. Bulgaria
BOYADZHIEVA AND GLORIA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED EOOD v. Bulgaria BGR 05/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: Protection of property: Unjustified and disproportionate interference due to the automatic order to return payments the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50539
BULENA v. the Czech Republic
BULENA v. the Czech Republic CZE 20/07/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to the Constitutional Court due to its excessively formal interpretation of the admissibility rules. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6120
Bazarov v. Belarus
Bazarov v. Belarus CCPR/C/111/D/1934/2010 Communication number s : 1934/2010 Author: Igor Bazarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Oct 2009 Date of decision 24 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1934/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1845/en-US
Berik Zhagiparov v. Kazakhstan
Berik Zhagiparov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/124/D/2441/2014 Communication number s : 2441/2014 Author: Berik Zhagiparov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 12 Jun 2014 Date of decision 25 Oct 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2441/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2553/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY 9042/04 BERGE H. NOR 5/31/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY Application no. 9042/04 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 31 May 2007 FINAL ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80744
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A, B AND C v. LATVIA
CASE OF A B AND C v. LATVIA 30808/11 MOLA I. LVA 3/31/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD003080811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161741