Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 25
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5878/08 WISTRICH H. GBR 3/30/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Offences under the Health and Safety at Work ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161975
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN 43611/11 LOVEDAY D. SWE 3/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Conditional Iran No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iran ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0323JUD004361111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161829
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF ORLANDI AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF ORLANDI AND OTHERS v. ITALY 26431/12 26742/12 44057/12 60088/12 BILOTTA F. ROTELLI A. MOSCATI M.F. TORINO R. D AMICO M.E. CLARA M. PITEA C. RAGNI C. ITA 12/14/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1214JUD002643112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179547
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA 56774/18 SIMAITIS R. LTU 6/13/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005677418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225220
Conclusions 2006 - Moldova - Article 12-4
Conclusions 2006 Moldova Article 12 4 MDA 12 04 000 30/06/2006 30/06/2006 Article 12 Right to social security Paragraph 4 Social security of persons moving between states The Committee takes note of the information provided in the Moldovan report. Moldova ESC2006/def/MDA/12/4/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2006/def/MDA/12/4/EN
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
M.W. v. Denmark v. Denmark
M.W. v. Denmark v. Denmark CEDAW/C/63/D/46/2012 Communication number s : 046/2012 Author: M.W. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 21 Aug 2012 Date of decision 22 Feb 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/63/D/46/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2098/en-US
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : CHINA
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : CHINA A/HRC/11/25 NULL 2009 05 29T06:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/11/25 Distr.: General 5 October 2009 General Assembly Original: English Human Rights Council Eleventh session Agenda item 6 UHRIA/HRC/11/25https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ce1b6e7f-015f-4e5d-8b94-c3cf7cde39f8
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN A/HRC/14/12 NULL 2010 03 14T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/14/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 15 March 2010 Original: English Human Rights Council Fourteenth UHRIA/HRC/14/12https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8ed62c7d-d890-4e16-b85e-046fac411e82
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : LAO PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : LAO PEOPLE S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC A/HRC/15/5 NULL 2010 06 15T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/15/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 15 June 2010 Original: English Human Rights Council UHRIA/HRC/15/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e0827cfe-ed73-4de2-aa06-7d5c9e52b64f
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : THE NETHERLANDS
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : THE NETHERLANDS A/HRC/8/31 NULL 2008 05 13T06:00:00 UPR UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/8/31 13 May 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Eighth session Agenda UHRIA/HRC/8/31https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ba1451db-b869-4235-b30b-9dd32f2d6098
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : VANUATU
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : VANUATU A/HRC/12/14 NULL 2009 06 04T00:00:00 UPR UNITED NATIONS A Distr. General Assembly GENERAL A/HRC/12/14 4 June 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Twelfth session Agenda item 6 UHRIA/HRC/12/14https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5adc918b-220b-42c4-8c28-1ea3a80778ff
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : ZAMBIA
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : ZAMBIA A/HRC/8/43 NULL 2008 06 02T06:00:00 UPR UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/8/43 2 June 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Eighth session Agenda item 6 UHRIA/HRC/8/43https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/75f343c1-0c1d-4bc9-9f40-12abfef6d0e9
REPORTOF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLE TO SELF-DETERMINATION : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO FIJI
REPORTOF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLE TO SELF DETERMINATION : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO FIJI A/HRC/7/7/Add.3 NULL 2008 01 08T06:00:00 WG Mercenaries UNITED UHRIA/HRC/7/7/Add.3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/40555bae-405b-4605-96c3-2a84112e94fd