Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 281 - 300 of 522
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON THE EIGHTH PERIODIC REPORT OF FINLAND
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON THE EIGHTH PERIODIC REPORT OF FINLAND CEDAW/C/FIN/CO/8 NULL 2022 11 01T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/FIN/CO/8 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 1 November 2022 against Women UHRICEDAW/C/FIN/CO/8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/496768be-f947-4f7e-9c37-ce13d875662a
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 19 OF THE CONVENTION : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE: ALBANIA
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 19 OF THE CONVENTION : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE: ALBANIA CAT/C/ALB/CO/2 NULL 2012 06 26T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/ALB/CO/2 Convention against UHRICAT/C/ALB/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1a982886-e720-4e8d-843e-a6b6c56e6509
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 19 OF THE CONVENTION: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE: EL SALVADOR
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 19 OF THE CONVENTION: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE: EL SALVADOR CAT/C/SLV/CO/2 NULL 2009 12 09T06:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/SLV/CO/2 Distr.: General 9 UHRICAT/C/SLV/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/087c89de-6727-4f47-83fd-97e3695a5660
CRC/C/KEN/CO/3-5 KENYA
CRC/C/KEN/CO/3 5 KENYA CRC/C/KEN/CO/3 5 NULL 2016 03 20T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/KEN/CO/3 5 Distr.: General 21 March 2016 Convention on theRights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations on the UHRICRC/C/KEN/CO/3-5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2bbcab03-b684-4dc1-8179-06335974b933
Castro Ortíz v. Colombia
Castro Ort z v. Colombia CCPR/C/85/D/1103/2002 Communication number s : 1103/2002 Author: Jaime Castro Ort z Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country Colombia Submission date 13 Dec 1998 Date of decision 28 Oct 2005 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1103/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/991/en-US
Cedeño v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Cede o v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/106/D/1940/2010 Communication number s : 1940/2010 Author: Eligio Cede o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission date 09 Mar 2010 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1940/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1463/en-US
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Germany
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Germany CRC/C/88/D/107/2019 Communication number s : 107/2019 Author: Chiara Sacchi Catarina Lorenzo Iris Duquesne Raina Ivanova Ridhima Pandey David Ackley III Ranton Anjain Litokne Kabua Deborah Adegbile Carlos Manuel Ayakha JUTBCRC/C/88/D/107/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2955/en-US
Comments of UNMIK on the Fourth Opinion on Kosovo*
Comments of UNMIK on the Fourth Opinion on Kosovo SRBKOS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES GVT/COM/IV 2017 007 Comments by the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo UNMIK on the FCNMhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Com_Kosovo_en
Comments of UNMIK on the Third Opinion on Kosovo*
Comments of UNMIK on the Third Opinion on Kosovo SRBKOS GVT/COM/III 2013 005 Strasbourg 10 September 2013 Public GVT/COM/III 2013 005 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES COMMENTS BY THE UNITED NATIONS FCNMGVT/COM/III(2013)005https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_Com_Kosovo_en
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Armenia
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Armenia ARM ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Strasbourg 13 February 2017 GVT/COM/IV 2017 002 Comments of the Government of Armenia on the Fourth FCNMhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Com_Armenia_en
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Poland
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Poland POL GVT/COM/IV 2020 002 GVT/COM/IV 2020 002 Comments of the Government of Poland on the Fourth Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the Framework Convention for the FCNMGVT/COM/IV(2020)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_COM_Poland_EN
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Switzerland
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Switzerland CHE GVT/COM/IV 2018 004 GVT/COM/IV 2018 004 Comments of the Government of Switzerland on the Fourth Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the Framework Convention for the FCNMGVT/COM/IV(2018)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Com_Switzerland_en
Comments of the Government on the Second Opinion on Slovenia
Comments of the Government on the Second Opinion on Slovenia SVN Strasbourg 1 December 2005 GVT/COM/INF/OP/II 2005 005 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF SLOVENIA ON THE FCNMhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=2nd_Com_Slovenia_en
Comments of the Government on the Third Opinion on Poland
Comments of the Government on the Third Opinion on Poland POL Strasbourg 21 May 2014 Public GVT/COM/III 2014 002 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF POLAND ON THE THIRD FCNMhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_Com_Poland_en
Comments submitted by Romania on GREVIO’s final report on the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Baseline Report)
Comments submitted by Romania on GREVIO s final report on the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence Baseline Report ROU 2022 06 16 Group of Experts on Action against GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)7_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Gov_Comments_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)7_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Gov_Comments_eng
Compilation on the United States of America - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/USA/2 General Assembly Distr.: General 11 March 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Compilation on the United States of America Report UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/USA/2https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/compilation-united-states-america-report-office-united-nations-high-commissioner
Conclusions XX-3 - Germany - Article 4-3
Conclusions XX 3 Germany Article 4 3 DEU 04 03 000 05/12/2014 08/12/2014 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 3 Non discrimination between women and men with respect to remuneration The Committee takes note of the information contained in the ESCXX-3/def/DEU/4/3/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XX-3/def/DEU/4/3/EN
Council holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concludes the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms
Human Rights CouncilAFTERNOON17 March 2017The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concluded the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms. In the general debate on the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review-and-concludes-general
Déogratias Niyonzima v. Burundi
D ogratias Niyonzima v. Burundi CAT/C/53/D/514/2012 Communication number s : 514/2012 Author: D ogratias Niyonzima represented by Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Burundi Submission date 23 Jul 2012 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/514/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2058/en-US
David v. Sweden
David v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/220/2002 Communication number s : 220/2002 Author: Ruben David Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Nov 2002 Date of decision 02 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/220/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/135/en-US