Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 79
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
Benaziza v. Algeria
Benaziza v. Algeria CCPR/C/99/D/1588/2007 Communication number s : 1588/2007 Author: Nedjma Benaziza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Algeria Submission date 13 Mar 2007 Date of decision 26 Jul 2010 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1588/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1485/en-US
Berkaoui v. Algeria
Berkaoui v. Algeria CCPR/C/130/D/2639/2015 Communication number s : 2639/2015 Author: Tassadit Berkaoui Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Algeria Submission date 04 Jun 2015 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2639/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3294/en-US
CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND 56925/08 PONCET C. CHE 7/1/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression 149 148 265 235 326 579 379 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508 SECOND SECTION CASE OF A.B. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145457
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF BENSAID v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BENSAID v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 44599/98 N/A GBR 2/6/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 13 350 193 192 451 429 203 268 107 333 329 444 110 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0206JUD004459998 THIRD SECTION CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0206JUD004459998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59206
CASE OF KAVALA v. TURKEY
CASE OF KAVALA v. TURKEY 28749/18 BAYRAKTAR K. TUR 12/10/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 c Reasonable suspicion Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1210JUD002874918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-199515
CASE OF KHASANOV AND RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHASANOV AND RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA 28492/15 49975/15 YERMOLAYEVA N. ZHARINOV K. TRENINA D. DAVIDYAN E. RUS 4/29/2022 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Kyrgyzstan 350 618 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0429JUD002849215https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-217061
CASE OF LAMY v. BELGIUM
CASE OF LAMY v. BELGIUM 10444/83 N/A BEL 3/30/1989 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 2 and 5 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 b Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0330JUD001044483https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57514
CASE OF M.E. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF M.E. v. SWEDEN 71398/12 PETERSSON S. A. SWE 6/26/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Libya Articles 407 and 408 of the Libyan Penal Code 350 620 14 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD007139812https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145018
CASE OF N.D. AND N.T. v. SPAIN
CASE OF N.D. AND N.T. v. SPAIN 8675/15 8697/15 GERICKE C. BOYE G. ESP 2/13/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0213JUD000867515https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201353
CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARK
CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARK 57467/15 TRIER T. BOELSKIFTE A. DNK 10/1/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Turkey Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Article 41 Non pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD005746715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-196152
Déogratias Niyonzima v. Burundi
D ogratias Niyonzima v. Burundi CAT/C/53/D/514/2012 Communication number s : 514/2012 Author: D ogratias Niyonzima represented by Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Burundi Submission date 23 Jul 2012 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/514/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2058/en-US
Eliseev v. Kyrgyzstan
Eliseev v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/130/D/2500/2014 Communication number s : 2500/2014 Author: Aleksei Eliseev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 14 Mar 2014 Date of decision 21 Oct 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2500/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3291/en-US
European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 030)
European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ETS No. 030 030 Strasbourg 1959 04 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Strasbourg 1962 06 12T00:00:00 3 Ratifications. Under this COEETS No. 030https://rm.coe.int/16800656ce
Government comments on the third report on Malta
Government comments on the third report on Malta MLT 2007 12 14 2008 04 29 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIMLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENG
Guezout and Rakik v. Algeria
Guezout and Rakik v. Algeria CCPR/C/105/D/1753/2008 Communication number s : 1753/2008 Author: Yamina Guezout and her two sons Abderrahim and Bachir Rakik Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Algeria Submission date 22 Nov 2007 Date JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1753/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1653/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of India, Finland, and the Philippines
AFTERNOON 27 March 2023 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of India Finland and the Philippines. The Council adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of India. The Vice President said 221 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-india-finland-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Republic of Moldova, Haiti and Antigua and Barbuda
Human Rights Council MIDDAY 16 March 2012Council Concludes First Four Year Universal Periodic Review CycleThe Human Rights Council in its midday meeting today adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the Republic of Moldova Haiti and UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-republic
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review of Iceland, Zimbabwe and Lithuania
Human Rights CouncilMIDDAY16 March 2017The Human Rights Council in its midday meeting adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Iceland Zimbabwe and Lithuania.Hogni S. Kristjansson Permanent Representative of Iceland to the United Nations Office UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-iceland