Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 95
CASE OF AREWA v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF AREWA v. LITHUANIA 16031/18 RAKAUSKAS V. LTU 3/9/2021 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Reasonable time 445 76 406 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD001603118 SECOND SECTIONCASE OF AREWA ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD001603118https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208363
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF BILGIN v. TURKEY
CASE OF BILGIN v. TURKEY 23819/94 N/A TUR 11/16/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 8 P1 1 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 or 18 Failure to comply with obligations under former Art. 25 1 Art. 34 Pecuniary damage financial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1116JUD002381994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58987
CASE OF KASYMAKHUNOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KASYMAKHUNOV v. RUSSIA 29604/12 KOROTEYEV K. RYABININA E. RUS 11/14/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Positive obligations Uzbekistan Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD002960412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-128055
CASE OF KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA 11082/06 13772/05 MOSKALENKO K. DREL A. BLAKE N. QC PANNICK D. Lord QC GLASSON J. PEUKERT W. Dr LIPTSER Y. BARU Y. CASSESE A. Prof TOMUSCHAT Ch. Prof RUS 7/25/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0725JUD001108206https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122697
CASE OF KIYUTIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KIYUTIN v. RUSSIA 2700/10 KOMOLOVA L. RUS 3/10/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage award HIV Prevention Act no. 38 FZ of 30 March 1995 Article 122 of the Criminal Code Foreign Nationals Act no. 115 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0310JUD000270010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-103904
CASE OF M.T. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF M.T. v. SWEDEN 1412/12 NORBERG N. SWE 2/26/2015 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Kyrgyzstan 350 620 14 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0226JUD000141212 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF M.T. v. SWEDEN Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0226JUD000141212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-152600
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753
CASE OF NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NA T LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 TRIAL INTERNATIONAL CHE 3/15/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Article 41 of the Swiss Code of Obligations Section 3 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181789
CASE OF OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. RUSSIA 14902/04 GARDNER P. RUS 9/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 b Violation of P1 1 No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 14 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD001490204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106308
CASE OF S.H. v. MALTA
CASE OF S.H. v. MALTA 37241/21 FALZON N. MLT 12/20/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1220JUD003724121https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-221838
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA 56774/18 SIMAITIS R. LTU 6/13/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005677418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225220
CASE OF ZHANG v. UKRAINE
CASE OF ZHANG v. UKRAINE 6970/15 PODKOPAYEV A.V. UKR 11/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113JUD000697015https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187602
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Germany
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Germany CRC/C/88/D/107/2019 Communication number s : 107/2019 Author: Chiara Sacchi Catarina Lorenzo Iris Duquesne Raina Ivanova Ridhima Pandey David Ackley III Ranton Anjain Litokne Kabua Deborah Adegbile Carlos Manuel Ayakha JUTBCRC/C/88/D/107/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2955/en-US
Council holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concludes the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms
Human Rights CouncilAFTERNOON17 March 2017The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concluded the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms. In the general debate on the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review-and-concludes-general
Government comments on the third report on Malta
Government comments on the third report on Malta MLT 2007 12 14 2008 04 29 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIMLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENG
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of India, Finland, and the Philippines
AFTERNOON 27 March 2023 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of India Finland and the Philippines. The Council adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of India. The Vice President said 221 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-india-finland-and
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Panama, Mongolia, Maldives, Andorra and Honduras
AFTERNOON 16 March 2021 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Panama Mongolia Maldives Andorra and Honduras. The following civil society organizations took the floor on the Universal Periodic Review UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-panama
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcome of Bosnia and Herzegovina, holds debate on the International Decade for People of African Descent, and suspends its forty-third session
Council Extends All Mandates and Mandated Activities that would otherwise Expire and Appoints 19 Special Procedure Mandate Holders The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Bosnia and Herzegovina and held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2020/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcome-bosnia-and
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcomes of the Central African Republic and Monaco
Human Rights CouncilAFTERNOON 14 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of the Central African Republic and Monaco. L opold Ismael Samba Permanent Representative of the Central African Republic to UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-central-african