Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4861 - 4878 of 4878
Yuri Bolshakov v. Russian Federation
Yuri Bolshakov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/112/D/1946/2010 Communication number s : 1946/2010 Author: Yuri Bolshakov not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Feb 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1946/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1886/en-US
Yurich v. Chile
Yurich v. Chile CCPR/C/85/D/1078/2002 Communication number s : 1078/2002 Author: Norma Yurich Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country Chile Submission date 10 Jul 2001 Date of decision 02 Nov 2005 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1078/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1233/en-US
Yury Orkin v. Russian Federation
Yury Orkin v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/126/D/2410/2014 Communication number s : 2410/2014 Author: Yury Orkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Russian Federation Submission date 16 Dec 2013 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2410/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2781/en-US
Z.A.H. v. Canada
Z.A.H. v. Canada CAT/C/61/D/687/2015 Communication number s : 687/2015 Author: Z.A.H. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 61 Country Canada Submission date 22 Jun 2015 Date of decision 11 Aug JUTBCAT/C/61/D/687/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2284/en-US
Z.H. v. Canada
Z.H. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/604/2014 Communication number s : 604/2014 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 18 May 2014 Date of decision 20 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/56/D/604/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2071/en-US
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/698/2015 Communication number s : 698/2015 Author: Z.K. and A.K. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Aug 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/698/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2722/en-US
Zündel (2) v. Canada
Z ndel 2 v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1341/2005 Communication number s : 1341/2005 Author: Ernst Z ndel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jan 2005 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: Request for interim JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1341/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1332/en-US
Z v. Australia
Z v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/802/2017 Communication number s : 802/2017 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 01 Feb 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/802/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3368/en-US
Z v. United Republic of Tanzania
Z v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/22/D/24/2014 Communication number s : 24/2014 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 12 Jun 2014 Date of decision 19 Sep 2019 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/24/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3131/en-US
Zare v. Sweden
Zare v. Sweden CAT/C/36/D/256/2004 Communication number s : 256/2004 Author: Mehdi Zare Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Sweden Submission date 22 Sep 2004 Date of decision 12 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/256/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/114/en-US
Zavrel v. Czech Republic
Zavrel v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/99/D/1615/2007 Communication number s : 1615/2007 Author: Bohuslav Zavrel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Czech Republic Submission date 12 Mar 2006 Date of decision 27 Jul 2010 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1615/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1132/en-US
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany CERD/C/72/D/38/2006 Communication number s : 038/2006 Author: Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Germany Submission date 29 Aug 2006 JUTBCERD/C/72/D/38/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1732/en-US
Zilkija Selimović et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Zilkija Selimovi et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/111/D/2003/2010 Communication number s : 2003/2010 Author: Zilkija Selimovi et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 04 May 2010 Date JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2003/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1859/en-US
Zvozskov et al v. Belarus
Zvozskov et al v. Belarus CCPR/C/88/D/1039/2001 Communication number s : 1039/2001 Author: Boris Zvozskov et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Nov 2001 Date of decision 17 Oct 2006 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1039/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1313/en-US
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato (UNADIS) v. Italy, Complaint No. 147/2017
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato UNADIS v. Italy Complaint No. 147/2017 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 01 04 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 00 163 2021 06 30 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-147-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-147-2017-dmerits-en
Černáková v. Slovakia
ern kov v. Slovakia CAT/C/72/D/890/2018 Communication number s : 890/2018 Author: Lucia ern kov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Slovakia Submission date 10 Jul 2018 Date of decision 19 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/72/D/890/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3337/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC