Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 825
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4%282021%293-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
A.A. v. Denmark
A.A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/122/D/2595/2015 Communication number s : 2595/2015 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Denmark Submission date 08 Apr 2015 Date of decision 22 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2595/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2444/en-US
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
Addendum to the Second Compliance Report Greece
Addendum to the Second Compliance Report Greece GRC 2022 03 25 2022 06 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Addendum to the Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Greece to implement the recommendations issued in the Fourth Round GRECOGrecoRC4-2022-8-eng-Add-to-2nd-Compliance-Report-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2022-8-eng-Add-to-2nd-Compliance-Report-Greece-PUBLIC
Addendum to the Second Compliance report North Macedonia
Addendum to the Second Compliance report North Macedonia MKD 2022 03 22 2022 07 04 I. INTRODUCTION This Addendum to the Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of North Macedonia to implement the recommendations issued in GRECOGrecoRC4-2022-7-Final-eng-Addto2ndComplianceReport-NorthMacedonia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2022-7-Final-eng-Addto2ndComplianceReport-NorthMacedonia-PUBLIC
Aouf v. Belgium
Aouf v. Belgium CCPR/C/86/D/1010/2001 Communication number s : 1010/2001 Author: Lass ad Aouf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belgium Submission date 22 May 2001 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1010/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1201/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Borzov v. Estonia
Borzov v. Estonia CCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002 Communication number s : 1136/2002 Author: Vjatseslav Borzov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Estonia Submission date 02 Nov 2001 Date of decision 26 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1129/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF ABDALOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF ABDALOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN 28508/11 37602/11 43776/11 BAGIROV K. ALIYEV I. AZE 7/11/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 37 Striking out applications general Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Right to free elections ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0711JUD002850811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194294
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF ŞAHİN KARAKOÇ v. TURKEY
CASE OF AH N KARAKO v. TURKEY 19462/04 KIRD K M.A. KIRD K M. HANBAYAT M. TUR 4/29/2008 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429JUD001946204 SECOND SECTION CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429JUD001946204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86088
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515