Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1714
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4%282021%293-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.A.M. v. Sweden
A.A.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/48/D/413/2010 Communication number s : 413/2010 Author: A.A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Sweden Submission date 19 Feb 2010 Date of decision 23 May 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/48/D/413/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/49/en-US
A.A. v. Denmark
A.A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/122/D/2595/2015 Communication number s : 2595/2015 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Denmark Submission date 08 Apr 2015 Date of decision 22 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2595/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2444/en-US
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.F. v. Canada
A.F. v. Canada CCPR/C/131/D/2838/2016 Communication number s : 2838/2016 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Canada Submission date 18 Oct 2016 Date of decision 17 Mar 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2838/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3247/en-US
A.M.B. v. Ecuador
A.M.B. v. Ecuador E/C.12/58/D/3/2014 Communication number s : 003/2014 Author: A.M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Ecuador Submission date Date of decision 20 Jun 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBE/C.12/58/D/3/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2137/en-US
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum’a et al v. Libya
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010 Communication number s : 1958/2010 Author: A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 31 Mar 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1849/en-US
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
A.N.P. v. South Africa
A.N.P. v. South Africa CRPD/C/23/D/73/2019 Communication number s : 73/2019 Author: A.N.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country South Africa Submission date 19 Sep 2017 Date of decision 28 Aug 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/73/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3063/en-US
A.N. v. Denmark
A.N. v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2039/2011 Communication number s : 2039/2011 Author: A.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 31 Dec 2009 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2039/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3084/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Malta
A.S. et al. v. Malta CCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017 Communication number s : 3043/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Malta Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3300/en-US
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
Addendum to the Second Compliance Report Greece
Addendum to the Second Compliance Report Greece GRC 2022 03 25 2022 06 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Addendum to the Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Greece to implement the recommendations issued in the Fourth Round GRECOGrecoRC4-2022-8-eng-Add-to-2nd-Compliance-Report-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2022-8-eng-Add-to-2nd-Compliance-Report-Greece-PUBLIC