Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 2453
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/437/2010 Communication number s : 437/2010 Author: B.M.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 10 Aug 2010 Date of decision 12 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/437/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/17/en-US
B.P. and P.B. v. Netherlands
B.P. and P.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/128/D/2974/2017 Communication number s : 2974/2017 Author: B.P. and P.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Oct 2016 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2974/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2866/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal CCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009 Communication number s : 1863/2009 Author: Dev Bahadur Maharjan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1238/en-US
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo-Japalali v. Philippines
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo Japalali v. Philippines CCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015 Communication number s : 2536/2015 Author: Hadji Hamid Japalali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Philippines Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2569/en-US
Bekzhan et al. v. Kazakhstan
Bekzhan et al. v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2661/2015 Communication number s : 2661/2015 Author: Polat Bekzhan Leon Weaver Jr. and Helmut Echtle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 27 Mar 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3283/en-US
Belenky v. Belarus
Belenky v. Belarus CCPR/C/135/D/2860/2016 Communication number s : 2860/2016 Author: Yury Belenky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Belarus Submission date 05 Feb 2016 Date of decision 08 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2860/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3685/en-US
Bellini v. Italy
Bellini v. Italy CRPD/C/27/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 51/2018 Author: Maria Simona Bellini Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Italy Submission date 28 Mar 2017 Date of decision 26 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/27/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3604/en-US
Borzov v. Estonia
Borzov v. Estonia CCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002 Communication number s : 1136/2002 Author: Vjatseslav Borzov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Estonia Submission date 02 Nov 2001 Date of decision 26 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1129/en-US
Brandsma v. Netherlands
Brandsma v. Netherlands CCPR/C/80/D/977/2001 Communication number s : 977/2001 Author: R.P.C.W.M. Brandsma Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Oct 2000 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/977/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/376/en-US
Bujdosó v. Hungary
Bujdos v. Hungary CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011 Communication number s : 004/2011 Author: J nos Fiala Disability Rights Center Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Hungary Submission date 14 Sep 2011 Date of decision 09 Sep 2013 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/10/D/4/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1988/en-US
C.M. v. Switzerland
C.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/44/D/355/2008 Communication number s : 355/2008 Author: C.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Switzerland Submission date 28 Jul 2008 Date of decision 14 May 2010 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/44/D/355/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/67/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A AND OTHERS v. ICELAND
CASE OF A AND OTHERS v. ICELAND 25133/20 31856/20 SGEIRSSON J. J NSD TTIR .I. ISL 11/15/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1115JUD002513320https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-220885