Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 141 - 160 of 338
E.E. v. Russian Federation
E.E. v. Russian Federation CAT/C/50/D/479/2011 Communication number s : 479/2011 Author: E.E. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Russian Federation Submission date 26 Aug 2010 Date of decision 24 May 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/50/D/479/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/13/en-US
E.T. v. Sweden,Switzerland
E.T. v. Sweden Switzerland CAT/C/48/D/393/2009 Communication number s : 393/2009 Author: E.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Sweden Switzerland Submission date 27 Jul 2009 Date of decision 23 May 2012 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/48/D/393/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/28/en-US
Eglė Kusaitė v. Lithuania
Egl Kusait v. Lithuania CCPR/C/126/D/2716/2016 Communication number s : 2716/2016 Author: Egl Kusait Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Lithuania Submission date 30 Oct 2015 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2716/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2782/en-US
European Social Charter (revised) (ETS No. 163)
European Social Charter revised ETS No. 163 163 Strasbourg 1996 05 03T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe Strasbourg 1999 07 01T00:00:00 3 Ratifications. The European Social Charter revised of 1996 embodies in COEETS No. 163https://rm.coe.int/168007cf93
F.A.B. v. Switzerland
F.A.B. v. Switzerland CAT/C/43/D/348/2008/REV.1 Communication number s : 348/2008 Author: F.A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 43 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Jul 2008 Date of decision 17 Nov 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/43/D/348/2008/REV.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3220/en-US
F.A. v. Russian Federation
F.A. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/123/D/2189/2012 Communication number s : 2189/2012 Author: F.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Aug 2012 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2189/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2539/en-US
F.H.A. v. Denmark
F.H.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/75/D/108/2016 Communication number s : 108/2016 Author: F.H.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 17 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/108/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2704/en-US
F.K. v. Denmark
F.K. v. Denmark CAT/C/56/D/580/2014 Communication number s : 580/2014 Author: F.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Dec 2013 Date of decision 23 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/56/D/580/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2074/en-US
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT LUXEMBOURG
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2018 06 22 2018 06 27 Adoption : 22 June 2018 Publication : 27 June 2018 GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2017-5-Final-eng-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2017-5-Final-eng-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND, Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies, Evaluation Report, Belgium
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies Evaluation Report Belgium BEL 2019 12 06 2020 01 23 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Publication: 23 January 2020 GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2019)3-FINAL-eng-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2019)3-FINAL-eng-Belgium-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT AUSTRIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT AUSTRIA AUT 2016 10 21 2017 02 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-1-en-Final-Austria-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-1-en-Final-Austria-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT CROATIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT CROATIA HRV 2014 06 20 2014 06 25 / TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-7E-Final-Croatia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-7E-Final-Croatia-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ROMANIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ROMANIA ROU 2015 12 04 2016 01 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-4E-Final-Romania-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-4E-Final-Romania-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT TURKEY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT TURKEY TUR 2015 10 16 2016 03 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-3E-Final-Turkey-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-3E-Final-Turkey-PUBLIC
Fardon v. Australia
Fardon v. Australia CCPR/C/98/D/1629/2007 Communication number s : 1629/2007 Author: Robert John Fardon Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Australia Submission date 01 Mar 2006 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: An individual JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1629/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1574/en-US
Fedotova v. Russian Federation
Fedotova v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/106/D/1932/2010 Communication number s : 1932/2010 Author: Irina Fedotova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Russian Federation Submission date 10 Feb 2010 Date of decision 31 Oct 2012 JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1932/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1272/en-US
Fernando v. Sri Lanka
Fernando v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/83/D/1189/2003 Communication number s : 1189/2003 Author: Anthony Michael Emmanuel Fernando Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 10 Jun 2003 Date of decision 31 Mar 2005 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1189/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1166/en-US
Fifth Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Greece
Fifth Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Greece GRC 2021 12 03 2022 03 03 Adoption: 3 December 2021 Publication : 3 March 2022 Public GrecoRC5 2020 4 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top GRECOGrecoEval5(2020)4-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5(2020)4-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Greece-PUBLIC
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on the Slovak Republic
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on the Slovak Republic SVK 2019 06 21 2019 08 22 Adoption: 21 June 2019 Publication: 22 August 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 9 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)9-Final-eng-SlovakRep-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)9-Final-eng-SlovakRep-PUBLIC
Follow-up report v. Finland,Spain,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Finland Spain Switzerland CRC/C/90/2 Communication number s : 26/2017 28/2017 38/2017 40/2018 51/2018 56/2018 63/2018 76/2019 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 90 Country Finland Spain Switzerland Submission date JUTBCRC/C/90/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3560/en-US