Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9321 - 9340 of 9403
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination (Visit to EU institutions)
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.4 from 25 April 2016 to 28 April 2016 11 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Visit to EU institutions UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X. J. v. Netherlands
X. J. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008 Communication number s : 1840/2008 Author: X. J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Sep 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1249/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CCPR/C/126/D/3580/2019 Communication number s : 3580/2019 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Australia Submission date 25 May 2018 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/3580/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3304/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014 Communication number s : 2366/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 19 Mar 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2017/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CAT/C/53/D/458/2011 Communication number s : 458/2011 Author: X. represented by counsel Niels Erik Hansen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Denmark Submission date 10 May 2010 Date of decision 28 Nov 2014 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/53/D/458/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2039/en-US
X. v. Denmark,Ethiopia
X. v. Denmark Ethiopia CAT/C/53/D/458/2011 Communication number s : 458/2011 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Denmark Ethiopia Submission date 10 May 2010 Date of decision 28 Nov 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/53/D/458/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1945/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X. v. Kazakhstan
X. v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/55/D/554/2013 Communication number s : 554/2013 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 25 Jun 2013 Date of decision 03 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/55/D/554/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1970/en-US
X v. Russian Federation
X v. Russian Federation CAT/C/54/D/542/2013 Communication number s : 542/2013 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Russian Federation Submission date 04 Feb 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/542/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1955/en-US
X v. Spain
X v. Spain CCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006 Communication number s : 1456/2006 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Spain Submission date 14 Feb 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2008 Comment: The texts of two individual opinions one JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1448/en-US
X. v. Sri Lanka
X. v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/120/D/2256/2013 Communication number s : 2256/2013 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 11 Feb 2013 Date of decision 27 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2256/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2344/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/765/2016 Communication number s : 765/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Aug 2016 Date of decision 23 Nov 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/65/D/765/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2591/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015 Communication number s : 2681/2015 Author: Y.A.A. and F.H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Nov 2015 Date of decision 10 Mar 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2293/en-US
Y AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
Y AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 05/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to protect the life of a woman who was a victim of domestic violence had filed several complaints stating that she feared for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61103