Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6361 - 6380 of 6424
Wright v. Jamaica
Wright v. Jamaica CCPR/C/45/D/349/1989 Communication number s : 349/1989 Author: Clifton Wright Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1989 Date of decision 27 Jul 1992 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/349/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/423/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/789/2016 Communication number s : 789/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 21 Oct 2016 Date of decision 27 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/789/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3356/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014 Communication number s : 2366/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 19 Mar 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2017/en-US
X v. Colombia
X v. Colombia CCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005 Communication number s : 1361/2005 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Colombia Submission date 13 Jan 2001 Date of decision 30 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion co signed by JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1338/en-US
X v. Denmark
X v. Denmark CCPR/C/113/D/2515/2014 Communication number s : 2515/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Dec 2014 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2515/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3752/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US
X v. Lithuania
X v. Lithuania CCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015 Communication number s : 2564/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Aug 2014 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3318/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
X v. Russian Federation
X v. Russian Federation CAT/C/54/D/542/2013 Communication number s : 542/2013 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Russian Federation Submission date 04 Feb 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/542/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1955/en-US
X. v. Sri Lanka
X. v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/120/D/2256/2013 Communication number s : 2256/2013 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 11 Feb 2013 Date of decision 27 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2256/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2344/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/765/2016 Communication number s : 765/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Aug 2016 Date of decision 23 Nov 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/65/D/765/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2591/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
X v. United Republic of Tanzania
X v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/18/D/22/2014 Communication number s : 022/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 23 Jun 2014 Date of decision 18 Aug 2017 Comment: JUTBCRPD/C/18/D/22/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2390/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569