Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 32
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POHARNOK B. HUN 3/14/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 f Expulsion Prevent unauthorised entry into country Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172091
CASE OF KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 26587/07 CHIMIROV A. DANIEL R. RUS 6/26/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention Violation of Article 9 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD002658707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145013
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753
CASE OF PAVLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF PAVLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 31612/09 SOMMER U. RUS 10/11/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1011JUD003161209https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219640
CASE OF SALMAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF SALMAN v. TURKEY 21986/93 TUR 6/27/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 2 with regard to death in custody Violation of Art. 2 with regard to failure to carry out an effective investigation Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0627JUD002198693https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58735
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (ETS No. 127)
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters ETS No. 127 127 Strasbourg 1988 01 25T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and the Member countries of OECD and in its version amended by the 2010 COEETS No. 127https://rm.coe.int/16806a42b0
Doolan v. Australia
Doolan v. Australia CRPD/C/22/D/18/2013 Communication number s : 18/2013 Author: Manuway Doolan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Australia Submission date 19 Sep 2013 Date of decision 30 Aug 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/18/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3135/en-US
El Hassy v. Libya
El Hassy v. Libya CCPR/C/91/D/1422/2005 Communication number s : 1422/2005 Author: Edriss El Hassy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Libya Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 24 Oct 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1422/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1384/en-US
L.H., L.H., D.A, C.D. and A.F. v. France
L.H. L.H. D.A C.D. and A.F. v. France CRC/C/85/D/79/2019 Communication number s : 109/2019 79/2019 Author: L.H. L.H. D.A C.D. and A.F. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 85 Country France Submission date 13 Mar 2019 Date of decision 30 JUTBCRC/C/85/D/79/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3587/en-US
Leo v. Australia
Leo v. Australia CRPD/C/22/D/17/2013 Communication number s : 17/2013 Author: Christopher Leo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Australia Submission date 19 Sep 2013 Date of decision 30 Aug 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/17/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3134/en-US
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : AZERBAIJAN
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : AZERBAIJAN A/HRC/24/13 NULL 2013 07 05T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/24/13 General Assembly Distr.: General 5 July 2013 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty fourth session Agenda UHRIA/HRC/24/13https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/af25ecdd-4ee0-4e7b-a57d-8d2dedfc23d7
REPORT ON THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : PERU
REPORT ON THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : PERU A/HRC/8/37 NULL 2008 05 28T00:00:00 UPR UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/8/37 28 May 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Eighth session Agenda item 6 UHRIA/HRC/8/37https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/bcc2d21a-1014-4c80-8f5c-d3471b0394f9