Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 1044
CASE OF BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA 1748/02 SAMORODKINA M. RUS 10/2/2008 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 3 procedural aspect Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1002JUD000174802https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-88663
CASE OF BERGER-KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF BERGER KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA 14717/04 EFERIN LAW FIRM SVN 6/12/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Remainder inadmissible Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD001471704https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144669
CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 24117/08 HATLAND T. NOR 3/14/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for home Section 3 5 1 3 6 1 and sub ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002411708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117133
CASE OF BETTERIDGE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BETTERIDGE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 1497/10 CHIVERS SOLICITORS GBR 1/29/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Speediness of review 448 438 474 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129JUD000149710https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116121
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 3/25/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life No violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141941
CASE OF BITIYEVA AND X v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BITIYEVA AND X v. RUSSIA 57953/00 37392/03 MEMORIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE RUS 6/21/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 38 Examination of the case general Article 38 Examination of the case Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD005795300https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81211
CASE OF BOTOYAN v. ARMENIA
CASE OF BOTOYAN v. ARMENIA 5766/17 MELKONYAN A. HARUTYUNYAN H. AGHAGYULYAN A. ARM 2/8/2022 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for private life Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0208JUD000576617https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215472
CASE OF BOUKROUROU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUKROUROU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 30059/15 BOUZROU Y. FRA 11/16/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Life Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1116JUD003005915https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178921
CASE OF BRANKO TOMAŠIĆ AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
CASE OF BRANKO TOMA I AND OTHERS v. CROATIA 46598/06 BOJIC I. HRV 1/15/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 2 substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 21 of the Constitution Sections 38 and 55 of the Constitutional Court Act Article 75 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0115JUD004659806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90625
CASE OF BRINCAT AND OTHERS v. MALTA
CASE OF BRINCAT AND OTHERS v. MALTA 60908/11 62110/11 62129/11 62312/11 62338/11 GALEA J. MLT 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD006090811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145790
CASE OF BRONIOWSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF BRONIOWSKI v. POLAND 31443/96 N/A POL 6/22/2004 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0622JUD003144396https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61828
CASE OF BYRZYKOWSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF BYRZYKOWSKI v. POLAND 11562/05 N/A POL 6/27/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 2 procedural aspect Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0627JUD001156205https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76066
CASE OF C.A.S. AND C.S. v. ROMANIA
CASE OF C.A.S. AND C.S. v. ROMANIA 26692/05 THUAN G. ROU 3/20/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Inhuman treatment Procedural aspect Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0320JUD002669205https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109741
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND COSANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND COSANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7511/76 7743/76 N/A GBR 2/25/1982 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 2 No violation of Art. 3 Just satisfaction reserved Common law re assault Education Scotland Act 1980 350 193 90 192 89 573 446 427 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0225JUD000751176https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57455
CASE OF CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. GREECE
CASE OF CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. GREECE 25528/94 GRC 12/16/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 14 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Not necessary to examine P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002552894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58124
CASE OF CARABULEA v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CARABULEA v. ROMANIA 45661/99 EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE MACOVEI M. DAGALITA A. POPESCU N. ROU 7/13/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 2 substantive aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD004566199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99911
CASE OF CATAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF CATAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 43370/04 18454/06 8252/05 POSTICA A. MANOLE I. HUGHES P. DUFFY H. MDA RUS 10/19/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1019JUD004337004https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114082
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353