Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7941 - 7960 of 7994
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/36/47/Add.1 from 10 October 2016 to 19 October 2016 12 September 2017 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Central African UNSPA/HRC/36/47/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f47%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination (Visit to EU institutions)
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.4 from 25 April 2016 to 28 April 2016 11 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Visit to EU institutions UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CCPR/C/126/D/3580/2019 Communication number s : 3580/2019 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Australia Submission date 25 May 2018 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/3580/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3304/en-US
X v. Denmark
X v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2389/2014 Communication number s : 2389/2014 Author: Helle Holm Thomsen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 12 May 2014 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2389/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2061/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Spain
X v. Spain CCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006 Communication number s : 1456/2006 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Spain Submission date 14 Feb 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2008 Comment: The texts of two individual opinions one JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1448/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium CRC/C/79/D/12/2017 Communication number s : 012/2017 Author: Y.B. and N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Belgium Submission date 22 Mar 2017 Date of decision 27 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/79/D/12/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2421/en-US
Y.F. v. Panama
Y.F. v. Panama CRC/C/83/D/48/2018 Communication number s : 048/2018 Author: Y.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Panama Submission date 21 Jun 2018 Date of decision 03 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/83/D/48/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2630/en-US
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/434/2010 Communication number s : 434/2010 Author: Y.G.H. et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/51/D/434/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/7/en-US
Y.H.A. v. Australia
Y.H.A. v. Australia CAT/C/27/D/162/2000 Communication number s : 162/2000 Author: Y.H.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Australia Submission date 14 Apr 2000 Date of decision 23 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/27/D/162/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/195/en-US
Y v. United Republic of Tanzania
Y v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/20/D/23/2014 Communication number s : 023/2014 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 23 Jun 2014 Date of decision 31 Aug 2018 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/23/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2511/en-US