Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1230
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.H. and S.H. v. France
A.H. and S.H. v. France CAT/C/73/D/933/2019 Communication number s : 933/2019 Author: A.H. and S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country France Submission date 14 May 2019 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/73/D/933/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3335/en-US
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon CCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016 Communication number s : 2764/2016 Author: Cyrille Gervais Moutono Zogo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Cameroon Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2360/en-US
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014 Communication number s : 2483/2014 Author: Vladimir Adyrkhayev Behruz Solikhov and the Religious Association of Jehovah s Witnesses in Dushanb Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3555/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Ali and Ali v. Norway
Ali and Ali v. Norway CCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017 Communication number s : 2926/2017 Author: Imran Ali and Bakhtaware Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Norway Submission date 04 Jan 2017 Date of decision 14 Jul 2022 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3677/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Andorra has sharpened its criminal law but should reinforce its anti-discrimination body, says Council of Europe’s Anti-racism Commission
Andorra has sharpened its criminal law but should reinforce its anti discrimination body says Council of Europe s Anti racism Commission AND 2017 02 28 Fifth report on Andorra en fr cat Press Release 28.02.2017 Catalan version Andorra has sharpened its ECRIAND-PR-V-2017-235-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AND-PR-V-2017-235-ENG
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
Borzov v. Estonia
Borzov v. Estonia CCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002 Communication number s : 1136/2002 Author: Vjatseslav Borzov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Estonia Submission date 02 Nov 2001 Date of decision 26 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1129/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390