Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 880
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
BENDERSKIY v. Ukraine
BENDERSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial due to the domestic courts failure to consider an argument of substance advanced by the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31334
BENIN : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
BENIN : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/BEN/3 NULL 2018 10 01T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/BEN/3 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 1 October 2018 English and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/BEN/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4f5f2925-7602-430e-8b53-d01b5cd06b4d
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/126/D/2311/2013 Communication number s : 2311/2013 Author: Bakhytzhan Toregozhina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 30 May 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2311/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2902/en-US
Bech v. Norway
Bech v. Norway CCPR/C/68/D/882/1999 Communication number s : 882/1999 Author: Chris Bech Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Norway Submission date 28 Sep 1999 Date of decision 15 Mar 2000 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/68/D/882/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/892/en-US
Bekmanov and Egemberdiev v. Kyrgyzstan
Bekmanov and Egemberdiev v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/125/D/2312/2013 Communication number s : 2312/2013 Author: Alymbek Bekmanov and Damirbek Egemberdiev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 26 Mar 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2312/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3100/en-US
Bekzhan et al. v. Kazakhstan
Bekzhan et al. v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2661/2015 Communication number s : 2661/2015 Author: Polat Bekzhan Leon Weaver Jr. and Helmut Echtle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 27 Mar 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3283/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS 37328/97 N/A NLD 1/29/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 in respect of control of correspondence with the Commission and with lawyer No violation of Art. 8 in respect of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60019
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390
CASE OF A.K. v. LATVIA
CASE OF A.K. v. LATVIA 33011/08 OLSENA S. LVA 6/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for private life Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD003301108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145005