Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 901
8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women New York 18 December 1979 1 Entry into force : 3 September 1981 in accordance with article 27 1 . Registration : 3 UNIV-8https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
Adam Harun v. Switzerland
Adam Harun v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/758/2016 Communication number s : 758/2016 Author: Adam Harun represented by counsels Gabriella Tau et Boris Wijkstr m Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jul 2016 JUTBCAT/C/65/D/758/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2476/en-US
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Alberto Velásquez Echeverri v. Colombia
Alberto Vel squez Echeverri v. Colombia CCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017 Communication number s : 2931/2017 Author: Alberto Vel squez Echeverri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Aug 2016 Date of decision 21 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2863/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BOLIVIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BOLIVIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BOL/CO/3 NULL 2013 12 05T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BOL/CO/3 International Covenant on Distr.: General 6 December 2013 Civil and Political Rights English Original: Spanish Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BOL/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/73cd130d-8977-4250-b8a6-72853519661f
BOLIVIA : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY
BOLIVIA : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/BOL/3 NULL 2018 07 24T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/BOL/3 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 24 July 2018 English and Other Cruel Inhuman UHRICAT/OP/BOL/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/aacac74c-f65f-4e75-9cba-b614550a2d14
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS 37328/97 N/A NLD 1/29/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 in respect of control of correspondence with the Commission and with lawyer No violation of Art. 8 in respect of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60019
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA 53891/20 DOBREVA N. BGR 5/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523JUD005389120https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-224778
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390
CASE OF ABDI MAHAMUD v. MALTA
CASE OF ABDI MAHAMUD v. MALTA 56796/13 CAMILLERI K. CAMILLERI M. MLT 5/3/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503JUD005679613https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162424