Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3261 - 3280 of 3415
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2000/68/Add.3 from 14 June 1999 to 17 June 1999 27 January 2000 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences Haiti UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2000/68/Add.3 27 January UNSPE/CN.4/2000/68/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2000%2f68%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2004/94/Add.1 from 19 May 2003 to 27 May 2003 12 March 2004 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders Thailand UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2004/94/Add.1 12 March UNSPE/CN.4/2004/94/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2004%2f94%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 from 10 October 2004 to 21 October 2004 16 March 2005 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders T rkiye UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 UNSPE/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f101%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia CCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007 Communication number s : 1557/2007 Author: Stefan Lars Nystrom represented by the Human Rights Law Resource Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Australia Submission JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1211/en-US
Strakhov and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan
Strakhov and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001 1066/2002 Communication number s : 1066/2002 1017/2001 Author: S. Strakhova and Asad Fayzullaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Sep 2002 JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001&1066/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1405/en-US
Strakhova and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan
Strakhova and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001 1066/2002 Communication number s : 1066/2002 1017/2001 Author: Ms. S. Strakhova mother of Mr. Maxim Strakhov and Mr. Asad Fayzullaev on behalf of his son Nigmat Type of decision: Decision on JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001,1066/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3214/en-US
Strik v. Netherlands
Strik v. Netherlands CCPR/C/76/D/1001/2001 Communication number s : 1001/2001 Author: Jacobus Gerardus Strik Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Netherlands Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 01 Nov 2002 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/1001/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1029/en-US
Sudalenko v. Belarus
Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/104/D/1750/2008 Communication number s : 1750/2008 Author: Leonid Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Mar 2005 Date of decision 14 Mar 2012 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1750/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1221/en-US
Suleymanova and Israfilova v. Azerbaijan
Suleymanova and Israfilova v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/133/D/3061/2017 Communication number s : 3061/2017 Author: Jaarey Suleymanova and Gulnaz Israfilova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 26 Jul 2017 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3061/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3165/en-US
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/855/2017 Communication number s : 855/2017 Author: Susith Wasitha Ranawaka represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 20 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/855/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2699/en-US
T.I. v. Canada,Uzbekistan
T.I. v. Canada Uzbekistan CAT/C/45/D/333/2007 Communication number s : 333/2007 Author: T.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Canada Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 2007 Date of decision 15 Nov 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/45/D/333/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/62/en-US
T.J. v. Lithuania
T.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009 Communication number s : 1911/2009 Author: T.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Lithuania Submission date 12 Sep 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1329/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/228/2003 Communication number s : 228/2003 Author: T.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Mar 2003 Date of decision 18 Nov 2003 Comment: Committee member Mr. Fernando Mari o Men JUTBCAT/C/31/D/228/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/154/en-US
T v. New Zealand
T v. New Zealand CCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015 Communication number s : 2684/2015 Author: T Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3316/en-US
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39501
Tamihere v. New Zealand
Tamihere v. New Zealand CCPR/C/68/D/891/1999 Communication number s : 891/1999 Author: David Wayne Tamihere Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country New Zealand Submission date 20 Nov 1997 Date of decision 15 Mar 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/68/D/891/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/891/en-US
Telitsina v. Russian Federation
Telitsina v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/80/D/888/1999 Communication number s : 888/1999 Author: Yuliya Vasilyevna Telitsina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Russian Federation Submission date 24 Oct 1997 Date of decision 29 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/888/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1097/en-US
Tenth Activity Report (2014-2016)
Tenth Activity Report 2014 2016 ACFC/INF 2016 001 2016 05 27 2016 06 01 Strasbourg 27 May 2016 Restricted ACFC/INF 2016 001 Tenth Activity report covering the period 1 June 2014 31 May 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE ADVISORY FCNMACFC/INF(2016)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=10th_Activity_Report_2014_2016
Third Evaluation Round Addendum to the Second Compliance Report on the Russian Federation ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Addendum to the Second Compliance Report on the Russian Federation Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding RUS 2018 03 23 2018 06 25 Adoption: 23 March 2018 Public Publication: 25 June 2018 GrecoRC3 2018 5 GRECOGrecoRC3-2018-5-Final-eng-RussianFed-Add2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC3-2018-5-Final-eng-RussianFed-Add2ndRC-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Finland ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” *** ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Finland Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding FIN 2009 12 04 2009 12 04 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 4 December 2009 GRECOGreco-RC-III-2009-2E-Final-Finland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2009-2E-Final-Finland-PUBLIC