Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1461 - 1480 of 1718
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON THE COMBINED 5TH AND 6TH PERIODIC REPORTS OF MEXICO AS ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE AT ITS 49TH SESSION, 29 OCTOBER-23 NOVEMBER 2012 : COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON THE COMBINED 5TH AND 6TH PERIODIC REPORTS OF MEXICO AS ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE AT ITS 49TH SESSION 29 OCTOBER 23 NOVEMBER 2012 : COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE CAT/C/MEX/CO/5 6 NULL 2012 12 11T00:00:00 CAT United Nations UHRICAT/C/MEX/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f00d0499-dc20-4c61-b0d7-d1996ea8411b
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION : INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRI
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION : INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL UHRICERD/C/CAN/CO/18https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/383c658f-c2c7-4368-b57f-62be42c42c0f
COTTIN v. Belgium
COTTIN v. Belgium BEL 02/09/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to respect the adversarial principle in criminal proceedings for assault due to the establishment of an expert medical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1415
Calle Savigny v. France
Calle Savigny v. France CCPR/C/85/D/1283/2004 Communication number s : 1283/2004 Author: Adela Calle Savigny Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country France Submission date 16 Apr 2004 Date of decision 28 Oct 2005 Comment: Pursuant JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1283/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1179/en-US
Carvallo Villar v. Spain
Carvallo Villar v. Spain CCPR/C/85/D/1059/2002 Communication number s : 1059/2002 Author: H ctor Luciano Carvallo Villar Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country Spain Submission date 12 Feb 2001 Date of decision 28 Oct 2005 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1059/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1231/en-US
Casanovas v. France
Casanovas v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1514/2006 Communication number s : 1514/2006 Author: Robert Casanovas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 94 Country France Submission date 28 Sep 2006 Date of decision 28 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1514/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1475/en-US
Christian Nekvedavičius v. Lithuania
Christian Nekvedavi ius v. Lithuania CCPR/C/121/D/2802/2016 Communication number s : 2802/2016 Author: Christian Nekvedavi ius Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jul 2014 Date of decision 09 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2802/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2364/en-US
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Romania
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Romania ROU ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES GVT/COM/IV 2018 001 Comments of the Government of Romania on the Fourth Opinion of the Advisory FCNMhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Com_Romania_en
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on the Russian Federation
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on the Russian Federation RUS GVT/COM/IV 2018 006 GVT/COM/IV 2018 006 Comments of the Government of the Russian Federation on the Fourth Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the FCNMGVT/COM/IV(2018)006https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Com_Russianfederation_en
Comments submitted by Sweden on GREVIO’s final report on the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Baseline Report)
Comments submitted by Sweden on GREVIO s final report on the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence Baseline Report SWE 2019 01 21 Group of Experts on Action against GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2019)2_Sweden_Baseline_Evaluation_Gov_Comments_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2019)2_Sweden_Baseline_Evaluation_Gov_Comments_eng
Conclusions 2011 - Andorra - Article 17-1
Conclusions 2011 Andorra Article 17 1 AND 17 01 163 09/12/2011 17/01/2012 Article 17 Right of children and young persons to social legal and economic protection Paragraph 1 Assistance education and training The Committee takes note of the information ESC2011/def/AND/17/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2011/def/AND/17/1/EN
Conclusions 2014 - France - Article 28
Conclusions 2014 France Article 28 FRA 28 00 163 05/12/2014 08/12/2014 Article 28 Right of workers representatives to protection in the undertaking and facilities to be accorded to them The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report ESC2014/def/FRA/28/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2014/def/FRA/28/EN
Conclusions 2014 - Portugal - Article 26-1
Conclusions 2014 Portugal Article 26 1 PRT 26 01 163 05/12/2014 08/12/2014 Article 26 Right to dignity in the workplace Paragraph 1 Sexual harassment The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Portugal. Prevention The ESC2014/def/PRT/26/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2014/def/PRT/26/1/EN
Conclusions 2014 - Portugal - Article 26-2
Conclusions 2014 Portugal Article 26 2 PRT 26 02 163 05/12/2014 08/12/2014 Article 26 Right to dignity in the workplace Paragraph 2 Moral harassment The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Portugal. Prevention The ESC2014/def/PRT/26/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2014/def/PRT/26/2/EN
Conclusions 2016 - Ukraine - Article 24
Conclusions 2016 Ukraine Article 24 UKR 24 00 163 09/12/2016 12/12/2016 Article 24 Right to protection in case of dismissal The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Ukraine. The Committee notes that there were no ESC2016/def/UKR/24/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2016/def/UKR/24/EN
Conclusions XVII-1 - United Kingdom - Article 13-1
Conclusions XVII 1 United Kingdom Article 13 1 GBR 13 01 000 28/02/2005 28/02/2005 Article 13 Right to social and medical assistance Paragraph 1 Adequate assistance for every person in need The Committee notes the information in the United Kingdom s ESCXVII-1/def/GBR/13/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XVII-1/def/GBR/13/1/EN
Conclusions XX-3 - United Kingdom - Article 6-3
Conclusions XX 3 United Kingdom Article 6 3 GBR 06 03 000 05/12/2014 08/12/2014 Article 6 Right to bargain collectively Paragraph 3 Conciliation and arbitration The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by the United ESCXX-3/def/GBR/6/3/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XX-3/def/GBR/6/3/EN
DA CERVEIRA PINTO NADAIS DE VASCONCELOS v. Portugal
DA CERVEIRA PINTO NADAIS DE VASCONCELOS v. Portugal PRT 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative proceedings due to the infringement of the adversarial principle before the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51771
DEMIREL v. Turkey
DEMIREL v. Turkey TUR 28/04/2003 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand and absence of sufficient reasons given by domestic courts in their decisions extending such EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37264
DONADZE v. Georgia
DONADZE v. Georgia GEO 07/06/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the absence of an effective examination of the claimant s arguments by civil courts in proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3325