Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1108
13. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 13. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families New York 18 December 1990 Entry into force : 1 July 2003 in accordance with UNIV-13https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-13&chapter=4&clang=_en
3rd General Report on GREVIO’s activities
3rd General Report on GREVIO s activities 2022 06 14 2022 06 14 cyclePhraseHere Publication date: 14/06/2022 3rd GENERAL REPORT ON GREVIO S ACTIVITIES GREVIO Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence covering the GREVIO3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOChttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOC
A.B. v. Finland
A.B. v. Finland CRC/C/86/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 051/2018 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Finland Submission date 27 Jun 2018 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/86/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2946/en-US
A/HRC/47/7: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Kitts and Nevis
United Nations A/HRC/47/7 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/7https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc477-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-kitts-and
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
Almirati Garcia v. Uruguay
Almirati Garcia v. Uruguay CCPR/C/19/D/92/1981 Communication number s : 092/1981 Author: Laura Almirati Garcia alleged victim s daughter Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 19 Country Uruguay Submission date 05 Jun 1981 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/19/D/92/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/334/en-US
Andersen v. Denmark
Andersen v. Denmark CCPR/C/99/D/1868/2009 Communication number s : 1868/2009 Author: Fatima Andersen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 99 Country Denmark Submission date 13 Jan 2009 Date of decision 26 Jul 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1868/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1586/en-US
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
Babkin v. Russian Federation
Babkin v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/92/D/1310/2004 Communication number s : 1310/2004 Author: Konstantin Babkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jan 2004 Date of decision 03 Apr 2008 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1310/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1410/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Bandaranayake v. Sri Lanka
Bandaranayake v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/93/D/1376/2005 Communication number s : 1376/2005 Author: Soratha Bandaranayake Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 21 Jan 2005 Date of decision 24 Jul 2008 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1376/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1440/en-US
Barrionuevo and Bernabé v. Spain
Barrionuevo and Bernab v. Spain CCPR/C/98/D/1794/2008 Communication number s : 1794/2008 Author: Mar a Dolores Barrionuevo and Francisco Bernab Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Spain Submission date 20 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1794/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1580/en-US
Brada v. France
Brada v. France CAT/C/34/D/195/2002 Communication number s : 195/2002 Author: Mafhoud Brada Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country France Submission date 29 Nov 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2005 Comment: HR/CAT/PUB/1 p. 146 Substantive JUTBCAT/C/34/D/195/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/137/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay
C ceres et al. v. Paraguay CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016 Communication number s : 2751/2016 Author: Norma Portillo C ceres on her own behalf and that of her deceased brother Rub n Portillo C ceres Hermenegilda C ceres Isabel Bord n Ram rez on her own behalf and JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2784/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN 68519/10 LINDBERG C. O. SWE 4/3/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142085