Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 561 - 580 of 895
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
Dean v. New Zealand
Dean v. New Zealand CCPR/C/95/D/1512/2006 Communication number s : 1512/2006 Author: Allan Kendrick Dean Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country New Zealand Submission date 08 Sep 2006 Date of decision 17 Mar 2009 Comment: An individual JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1512/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1510/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL) v. Italy, Complaint No. 91/2013
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro CGIL v. Italy Complaint No. 91/2013 ITA 11 01 000 91 154 163 01 02 000 02 01 000 03 03 000 26 02 163 2015 10 12 2016 04 11 European Committee of Social Rights Comit ESCcc-91-2013-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-91-2013-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European Committee for Home-Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family (EUROCEF) v. France, complaint No. 114/2015
Decision on the merits: European Committee for Home Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family EUROCEF v. France complaint No. 114/2015 FRA 17 01 163 17 02 163 07 10 000 11 01 000 13 01 000 31 02 163 30 00 163 91 00 163 2018 01 24 2018 06 15 ESCcc-114-2015-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-114-2015-dmerits-en
Deisl v. Austria
Deisl v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002 Communication number s : 1060/2002 Author: Franz and Maria Deisl Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 17 Sep 2001 Date of decision 27 Jul 2004 Comment: The authors asked JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1128/en-US
Diergaardt et al. v. Namibia
Diergaardt et al. v. Namibia CCPR/C/69/D/760/1996 Communication number s : 760/1996 Author: J.G.A. Diergaardt et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Namibia Submission date 17 Nov 1996 Date of decision 25 Jul 2000 Comment: 7 JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/760/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/881/en-US
Djelloul Larbi v. Algeria
Djelloul Larbi v. Algeria CCPR/C/108/D/1831/2008 Communication number s : 1831/2008 Author: Djelloul Larbi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Oct 2008 Date of decision 25 Jul 2013 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1831/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1797/en-US
Dovran Bahramovich Matyakubov v. Turkmenistan
Dovran Bahramovich Matyakubov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2224/2012 Communication number s : 2224/2012 Author: Dovran Bahramovich Matyakubov represented by counsel Shane H. Brady Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2224/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2196/en-US
E. B. v. New Zealand
E. B. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005 Communication number s : 1368/2005 Author: E. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country New Zealand Submission date 24 Dec 2004 Date of decision 16 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1333/en-US
E.T. v. Netherlands
E.T. v. Netherlands CAT/C/65/D/801/2017 Communication number s : 801/2017 Author: E.T. represented by counsel Judith Pieters Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Nov 2018 JUTBCAT/C/65/D/801/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2594/en-US
El Goumari et al v. Spain
El Goumari et al v. Spain E/C.12/69/D/85/2018 Communication number s : 085/2018 Author: Hakima El Goumari and Ahmed Tidli Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Virtual Session Country Spain Submission date 12 May 2018 Date of decision 18 Feb JUTBE/C.12/69/D/85/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2923/en-US
El Khalek Attia v. Sweden
El Khalek Attia v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/199/2002 Communication number s : 199/2002 Author: Hanan Ahmed Fouad Abd El Khalek Attia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 28 Dec 2001 Date of decision 17 Nov 2003 JUTBCAT/C/31/D/199/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/156/en-US
Esergepov v. Kazakhstan
Esergepov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/116/D/2129/2012 Communication number s : 2129/2012 Author: Ramazan Esergepov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 30 Dec 2010 Date of decision 29 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2129/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3086/en-US
European Convention for the Protection of Animals during International Transport (Revised) (ETS No. 193)
European Convention for the Protection of Animals during International Transport Revised ETS No. 193 193 Chisinau 2003 11 06T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and by the European Union and for accession by non member States Chisinau COEETS No. 193https://rm.coe.int/1680083710
Evaluation Report Ireland
Evaluation Report Ireland IRL 2022 06 17 2023 02 16 Adoption: 17 June 2022 Publication: 16 February 2023 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2020 2 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2020-2-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Ireland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2020-2-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Ireland-PUBLIC
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
F.O.F. v. Brazil
F.O.F. v. Brazil CRPD/C/23/D/40/2017 Communication number s : 40/2017 Author: F.O.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Brazil Submission date 21 Dec 2016 Date of decision 02 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/40/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3071/en-US
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT ESTONIA
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT ESTONIA EST 2018 12 07 2018 12 07 Adoption Publication 7 December 2018 Public GrecoEval5Rep GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2018-3-Final-eng-Estonia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2018-3-Final-eng-Estonia-PUBLIC
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT FINLAND
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT FINLAND FIN 2018 03 23 2018 03 27 Adoption: 23 March 2018 Publication: 27 March 2018 Public GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2017-3-Final-eng-Finland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2017-3-Final-eng-Finland-PUBLIC
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT UNITED KINGDOM
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT UNITED KINGDOM GBR 2017 12 08 2018 05 17 Adoption: 8 December 2017 Publication: 17 May 2018 GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2017-1-Final-eng-UK-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2017-1-Final-eng-UK-PUBLIC