Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1081 - 1100 of 1195
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 from 10 October 2004 to 21 October 2004 16 March 2005 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders T rkiye UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 UNSPE/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f101%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Sroub v. Czech Republic
Sroub v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/97/D/1573/2007 Communication number s : 1573/2007 Author: Vaclav Sroub Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 97 Country Czech Republic Submission date 03 Dec 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1573/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1543/en-US
T.D.J. v. Denmark
T.D.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015 Communication number s : 2654/2015 Author: T.D.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Oct 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2813/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/228/2003 Communication number s : 228/2003 Author: T.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Mar 2003 Date of decision 18 Nov 2003 Comment: Committee member Mr. Fernando Mari o Men JUTBCAT/C/31/D/228/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/154/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
T.P.S. v. Canada
T.P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/24/D/99/1997 Communication number s : 099/1997 Author: T.P.S. name withheld Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 19 Nov 1997 Date of decision 16 May 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCAT/C/24/D/99/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/216/en-US
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T v. New Zealand
T v. New Zealand CCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015 Communication number s : 2684/2015 Author: T Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3316/en-US
Tadman and Prentice v. Canada
Tadman and Prentice v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1481/2006 Communication number s : 1481/2006 Author: Grant Tadman and Jeff Prentice Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 17 Nov 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1481/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1006/en-US
Taito Fa’afete v. New Zealand
Taito Fa afete v. New Zealand CCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009 Communication number s : 1909/2009 Author: Tony Ellis counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country New Zealand Submission date 12 May 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1983/en-US
Tamihere v. New Zealand
Tamihere v. New Zealand CCPR/C/68/D/891/1999 Communication number s : 891/1999 Author: David Wayne Tamihere Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country New Zealand Submission date 20 Nov 1997 Date of decision 15 Mar 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/68/D/891/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/891/en-US
Tatyana v. Poland
Tatyana v. Poland CCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006 Communication number s : 1517/2006 Author: Tatyana Rastorgueva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Poland Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 28 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1616/en-US
Taylor (Desmond) v. Jamaica
Taylor Desmond v. Jamaica CCPR/C/62/D/705/1996 Communication number s : 705/1996 Author: Desmond Taylor Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Jamaica Submission date 14 Jun 1996 Date of decision 02 Apr 1998 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/62/D/705/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/840/en-US
Teesdale v. Trinidad and Tobago
Teesdale v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/677/1996 Communication number s : 677/1996 Author: Kenneth Teesdale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 16 Mar 1995 Date of decision 01 Apr 2002 JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/677/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/953/en-US
Thabti v. Tunisia
Thabti v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/187/2001 Communication number s : 187/2001 Author: Dhaou Belgacem Thabti Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 01 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/187/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/166/en-US
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway CERD/C/67/D/30/2003 Communication number s : 030/2003 Author: The Jewish community of Oslo the Jewish community of Trondheim Rolf Kirchner Julius Paltiel the Norwegian Antiracist Centre and Nadeem Butt Type of JUTBCERD/C/67/D/30/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1740/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Andorra “Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * “Transparency of political party funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Andorra Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of political party funding AND 2013 10 18 2013 11 22 Adoption: 18 October 2013 Public Publication: 22 November 2013 Greco RC III 2013 12E Third GRECOGreco-RC-III-2013-12E-Final-Andorra-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2013-12E-Final-Andorra-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Belgium “Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GP 2)” * * * “Transparency of Political Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Belgium Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GP 2 Transparency of Political Party Funding BEL 2011 05 27 2011 08 10 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 27 May GRECOGreco-RC-III-2011-6E-Final-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2011-6E-Final-Belgium-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Germany ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” *** ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Germany Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding DEU 2011 12 09 2012 04 02 Directorate General I Human Rights and Rule of Law Information Society and Action against Crime Directorate GRECOGreco-RC-III-2011-9E-Final-Germany-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2011-9E-Final-Germany-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Belgium Transparency of Political Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Belgium Transparency of Political Party Funding Theme II BEL 2009 05 15 2009 06 22 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 15 May 2009 Public Greco Eval III Rep GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-8E-Final-Belgium-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-8E-Final-Belgium-PF-PUBLIC