Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 91
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
CASE OF AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 61498/08 SHINER P. GBR 3/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 34 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD006149808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97575
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5493/72 N/A GBR 12/7/1976 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 14 No violation of Art. 18 149 148 201 105 265 356 362 316 343 100 369 232 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1976:1207JUD000549372 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1976:1207JUD000549372https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57499
CASE OF KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA 11082/06 13772/05 MOSKALENKO K. DREL A. BLAKE N. QC PANNICK D. Lord QC GLASSON J. PEUKERT W. Dr LIPTSER Y. BARU Y. CASSESE A. Prof TOMUSCHAT Ch. Prof RUS 7/25/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0725JUD001108206https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122697
CASE OF KRISTIANSEN AND TYVIK AS v. NORWAY
CASE OF KRISTIANSEN AND TYVIK AS v. NORWAY 25498/08 BERGE H. NOR 5/2/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Non pecuniary damage award Sections 1 2 15 27 and 40 of the Patent ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0502JUD002549808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119049
CASE OF M.A. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF M.A. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 5115/18 SAVOVA I. BGR 2/20/2020 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Violation of Article 2 3 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0220JUD000511518https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201351
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753
CASE OF NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NA T LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 TRIAL INTERNATIONAL CHE 3/15/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Article 41 of the Swiss Code of Obligations Section 3 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181789
CASE OF NAIT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NAIT LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 MEMBREZ F. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court 445 40 7 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005135707 SECOND SECTION CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164470
CASE OF OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. RUSSIA 14902/04 GARDNER P. RUS 9/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 b Violation of P1 1 No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 14 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD001490204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106308
CASE OF OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OTHMAN ABU QATADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8139/09 PEIRCE G. FITZGERALD E. QC HUSAIN R. QC FRIEDMAN D. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Jordan No violation of Article 3 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000813909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108629
CASE OF SOLDATENKO v. UKRAINE
CASE OF SOLDATENKO v. UKRAINE 2440/07 BUSHCHENKO A.P. UKR 10/23/2008 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objections dismissed Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 3 in case ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1023JUD000244007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-89161
Chun Rong v. Australia
Chun Rong v. Australia CAT/C/49/D/416/2010 Communication number s : 416/2010 Author: Ke Chun Rong Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Australia Submission date 15 Mar 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/49/D/416/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/24/en-US
D and E v. Denmark
D and E v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2293/2013 Communication number s : 2293/2013 Author: D and E Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Oct 2013 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2293/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2268/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
J.S. v. Australia
J.S. v. Australia CCPR/C/135/D/2804/2016 Communication number s : 2804/2016 Author: J.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Australia Submission date 24 Aug 2016 Date of decision 01 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2804/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3682/en-US
Kwok v. Australia,China
Kwok v. Australia China CCPR/C/97/D/1442/2005 Communication number s : 1442/2005 Author: Kwok Yin Fong Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 97 Country Australia China Submission date 25 Nov 2005 Date of decision 23 Oct 2009 Comment: Under rule JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1442/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1542/en-US
Lim v. Australia
Lim v. Australia CCPR/C/87/D/1175/2003 Communication number s : 1175/2003 Author: Soo Ja Lim Seon Hui Lim and Hyung Joo Scott Lim Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Australia Submission date 24 Jan 2003 Date of decision 25 JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1175/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/994/en-US