Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 701 - 720 of 1105
O.G. v. Russian Federation
O.G. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/68/D/91/2015 Communication number s : 091/2015 Author: O.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Russian Federation Submission date Date of decision 06 Nov 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/68/D/91/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2429/en-US
O.N., D.P. v. Russian Federation
O.N. D.P. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017 Communication number s : 119/2017 Author: O.N. D.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Russian Federation Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2709/en-US
Olanguena Awono v. Cameroon
Olanguena Awono v. Cameroon CCPR/C/123/D/2660/2015 Communication number s : 2660/2015 Author: Urbain Olanguena Awono Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Cameroon Submission date 01 Jun 2015 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2660/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3518/en-US
PORTUGAL: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM
PORTUGAL: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM CAT/OP/PRT/2 NULL 2019 09 26T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/PRT/2 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 26 September 2019 and Other Cruel UHRICAT/OP/PRT/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6752b341-d7c5-46ee-b6c8-0c932e82ecf1
PRELIMINARY NOTE ON THE VISIT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON EXTRAJUDICIAL, SUMMARY OR ARBITRARY EXECUTIONS, PHILIP ALSTON, TO THE PHILIPPINES (12-21FEBRUARY 2007)
PRELIMINARY NOTE ON THE VISIT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON EXTRAJUDICIAL SUMMARY OR ARBITRARY EXECUTIONS PHILIP ALSTON TO THE PHILIPPINES 12 21FEBRUARY 2007 A/HRC/4/20/Add.3 NULL 2007 03 15T05:00:00 SR Summary executions UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL UHRIA/HRC/4/20/Add.3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/92e6be20-c0bc-4bbb-a3c9-d1724fb88693
Pereira Montero v. Uruguay
Pereira Montero v. Uruguay CCPR/C/18/D/106/1981 Communication number s : 106/1981 Author: Mabel Pereira Montero Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Uruguay Submission date 29 Aug 1981 Date of decision 31 Mar 1983 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/106/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/396/en-US
Pereira and the other members of the Campo Agua’ẽ indigenous community v. Paraguay
Pereira and the other members of the Campo Agua indigenous community v. Paraguay CCPR/C/132/D/2552/2015 Communication number s : 2552/2015 Author: Benito Oliveira Pereira and Lucio Guillermo Sosa Benega on their own behalf and that of the other m Type of JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2552/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3751/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
Polish Society of Anti-Discrimination Law v. Poland
Polish Society of Anti Discrimination Law v. Poland CEDAW/C/73/D/136/2018 Communication number s : 136/2018 Author: Polish Society of Anti Discrimination Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Poland Submission date 13 Sep JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/136/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2660/en-US
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Protsko et al v. Belarus
Protsko et al v. Belarus CCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015 CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016 Communication number s : 2897/2016 2909/2016 2910/2016 2915/2016 2712/2015 Author: Aleksandr Protsko and Eduard Nelyubovich Yury Lyashenko Natalya Shchukina Vladimir Katsora And Type JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015, CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3646/en-US
QATAR: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
QATAR: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/QAT/CO/3 4 NULL 2017 06 22T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/QAT/CO/3 4 Distr.: General Convention on theRights of the Child 22 June 2017 Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/QAT/CO/3-4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8b9dbdfd-cadb-4b4a-b885-0a721ffe6c0c
Queenan v. Canada
Queenan v. Canada CCPR/C/84/D/1379/2005 Communication number s : 1379/2005 Author: Peter Michael Queenan Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Canada Submission date 11 Nov 2004 Date of decision 26 Jul 2005 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1379/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1186/en-US
R.G. et al. v. Sweden
R.G. et al. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/586/2014 Communication number s : 586/2014 Author: R.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/56/D/586/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2068/en-US
R.G. v. Kyrgyzstan
R.G. v. Kyrgyzstan CEDAW/C/77/D/133/2018 Communication number s : 133/2018 Author: R.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 10 May 2018 Date of decision 03 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/77/D/133/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3130/en-US
R.I. v. Ecuador
R.I. v. Ecuador CRPD/C/22/D/25/2014 Communication number s : 25/2014 Author: R.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 22 Country Ecuador Submission date 18 Aug 2014 Date of decision 06 Sep 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/25/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3132/en-US
R.P.B. v. Philippines
R.P.B. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011 Communication number s : 034/2011 Author: R.P.B. represented by counsel Evalyn G. Ursua and Maria Karla L. Espinosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Philippines Submission date 23 May JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1875/en-US
R.S. v. Trinidad and Tobago
R.S. v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/684/1996 Communication number s : 684/1996 Author: R.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 13 Mar 1996 Date of decision 02 Apr 2002 Comment: The Committee JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/684/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/954/en-US
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON ADEQUATE HOUSING AS A COMPONENT OF THE RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE STANDARD OF LIVING, AND ON THE RIGHT TO NON-DISCRIMINATION IN THIS CONTEXT, MILOON KOTHARI : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO SPAIN
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON ADEQUATE HOUSING AS A COMPONENT OF THE RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE STANDARD OF LIVING AND ON THE RIGHT TO NON DISCRIMINATION IN THIS CONTEXT MILOON KOTHARI : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO SPAIN A/HRC/7/16/Add.2 NULL 2008 02 07T06:00:00 UHRIA/HRC/7/16/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/224330a2-4214-46d5-bdf2-596964883859
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON ADEQUATE HOUSING AS A COMPONENT OF THE RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE STANDARD OF LIVING, AND ON THE RIGHT TO NON-DISCRIMINATION IN THIS CONTEXT, RAQUEL ROLNIK: ADDENDUM: FOLLOW-UP TO COUNTRY RECOMMENDATIONS: BRAZIL, CAMBO
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON ADEQUATE HOUSING AS A COMPONENT OF THE RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE STANDARD OF LIVING AND ON THE RIGHT TO NON DISCRIMINATION IN THIS CONTEXT RAQUEL ROLNIK: ADDENDUM: FOLLOW UP TO COUNTRY RECOMMENDATIONS: BRAZIL CAMBODIA KENYA UHRIA/HRC/13/20/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/552c5327-45ac-4087-8c4c-d4bde4730a53