Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 1518
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
Bailey (Michael) v. Jamaica
Bailey Michael v. Jamaica CCPR/C/47/D/334/1988 Communication number s : 334/1988 Author: Michael Bailey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 47 Country Jamaica Submission date 22 Feb 1988 Date of decision 31 Mar 1993 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/47/D/334/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/657/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Baranovs v. Latvia
Baranovs v. Latvia CCPR/C/133/D/3021/2017 Communication number s : 3021/2017 Author: Ivans Baranovs Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Latvia Submission date 06 Sep 2017 Date of decision 18 Oct 2021 Comment: Individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3021/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3167/en-US
Baroy v. Philippines
Baroy v. Philippines CCPR/C/79/D/1045/2002 Communication number s : 1045/2002 Author: Alfredo Baroy Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Philippines Submission date 04 Jan 2002 Date of decision 31 Oct 2003 Comment: Under rule JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1045/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/372/en-US
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
Bator v. Poland
Bator v. Poland CCPR/C/84/D/1037/2001 Communication number s : 1037/2001 Author: Zdzislaw Bator Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Poland Submission date 03 Oct 2001 Date of decision 22 Jul 2005 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1037/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1161/en-US
Bazarov v. Uzbekistan
Bazarov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/87/D/959/2000 Communication number s : 959/2000 Author: Saimijon and Malokhat Bazarov alleged victim s parents Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Nov 2000 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/959/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1274/en-US
Bethel v. Trinidad and Tobago
Bethel v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/65/D/830/1998 Communication number s : 830/1998 Author: Christopher Bethel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 25 Aug 1998 Date of decision 31 Mar 1999 JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/830/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/780/en-US
Blaga and Blaga v. Portugal,Romania
Blaga and Blaga v. Portugal Romania CCPR/C/86/D/1158/2003 Communication number s : 1158/2003 Author: Aurel Blaga and Lucia Blaga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Portugal Romania Submission date 16 Jul 2002 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1158/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1242/en-US
Blazek et al. v. Czech Republic
Blazek et al. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/72/D/857/1999 Communication number s : 857/1999 Author: Miroslav Blazek George A. Hartman and George Krizek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Oct 1997 Date JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/857/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/927/en-US
Boboev et.al. v. Tajikistan
Boboev et.al. v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/120/D/2173/2012 Communication number s : 2173/2012 Author: Dzhuraboy Boboev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Tajikistan Submission date 09 Jul 2012 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2173/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2311/en-US
Brewer-Carías v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Brewer Car as v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/133/D/3003/2017 Communication number s : 3003/2017 Author: Allan Brewer Car as Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission date 21 Dec JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3003/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3164/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Byahuranga v. Denmark
Byahuranga v. Denmark CCPR/C/82/D/1222/2003 Communication number s : 1222/2003 Author: Jonny Rubin Byahuranga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Aug 2003 Date of decision 01 Nov 2004 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/1222/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1148/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CAFAGNA v. Italy
CAFAGNA v. Italy ITA 12/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 11:26:20 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the restriction of the applicant s defence rights resulting in his conviction on the basis of a statement made by an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48795
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 14499/09 RIMSTEN E. SWE 6/28/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Extradition Conditional Yemen No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Yemen 449 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0628JUD001449909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111553