Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2076
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.L. v. Spain
A.L. v. Spain CRC/C/81/D/16/2017 Communication number s : 016/2017 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Spain Submission date 15 May 2017 Date of decision 31 May 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/81/D/16/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2526/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3620/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3614/en-US
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASAN v. Turkey
ASAN v. Turkey TUR 27/02/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a violation of the right to freedom of expression on account of lack of reasoning and assessment of proportionality of an interference in judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37142
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Ali Djahangir oglu Quliyev v. Azerbaijan
Ali Djahangir oglu Quliyev v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/112/D/1972/2010 Communication number s : 1972/2010 Author: Ali Djahangir oglu Quliyev represented by counsel Eldar Zeynalov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Azerbaijan Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1972/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1892/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
BEG S.P.A. v. Italy
BEG S.P.A. v. Italy ITA 20/08/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: This case concerns the unfairness of voluntary arbitration proceedings which ended in 2002 due to the lack of impartiality of an arbitrator top official and counsel of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58315
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRAZZI v. Italy
BRAZZI v. Italy ITA 18/03/2019 00:00:00 05/04/2019 11:14:01 Case Description: The case concerns the lack of effective judicial supervision of a house search devoid of any financial implications violation of Article 8 2 . A search of the applicant s second EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51879
BULGARIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BULGARIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BGR/CO/4 NULL 2018 11 15T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BGR/CO/4 International Covenant on Distr.: General 15 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BGR/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0f805209-6d8b-4da5-aaca-58d2128cac00
BUTURUGA v. Romania
BUTURUGA v. Romania ROU 11/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: The case concerns the lack of an effective investigation into the applicant s allegations of domestic violence and of violation of the confidentiality of electronic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55605
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CAMILLERI v. Malta
CAMILLERI v. Malta MLT 27/05/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Unclear criminal law: lack of guidelines in the legislation for the public prosecutor s choice as to which type of court Criminal Court or Magistrates Court should try a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4117