Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2581 - 2591 of 2591
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 from 18 February 2013 to 22 February 2013 5 August 2013 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras United UNSPA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f45%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/789/2016 Communication number s : 789/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 21 Oct 2016 Date of decision 27 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/789/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3356/en-US
Y.B. v. Russian Federation
Y.B. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/110/D/1983/2010 Communication number s : 1983/2010 Author: Y.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Russian Federation Submission date 06 Apr 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1983/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1813/en-US
Y.R. v. Australia
Y.R. v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/713/2015 Communication number s : 713/2015 Author: Y.R. represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Australia Submission date 27 Oct 2015 Date of decision 03 Aug 2017 Comment: Decision of JUTBCAT/C/61/D/713/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2277/en-US
Y.S. v. Australia
Y.S. v. Australia CAT/C/59/D/633/2014 Communication number s : 633/2014 Author: Y.S. represented by counsel John Phillip Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Australia Submission date 10 Oct 2014 Date of decision 15 Nov 2016 JUTBCAT/C/59/D/633/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2195/en-US
Y.Z.S. v. Australia
Y.Z.S. v. Australia CAT/C/49/D/417/2010 Communication number s : 417/2010 Author: Y.Z.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2010 Date of decision 23 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/417/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/25/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/512/2012 Communication number s : 512/2012 Author: Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 06 Jan 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/55/D/512/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1980/en-US
Z.H. v. Australia
Z.H. v. Australia CCPR/C/107/D/1957/2010 Communication number s : 1957/2010 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Australia Submission date 14 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1957/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1652/en-US
Z.H. v. Canada
Z.H. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/604/2014 Communication number s : 604/2014 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 18 May 2014 Date of decision 20 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/56/D/604/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2071/en-US
Z v. Australia
Z v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/802/2017 Communication number s : 802/2017 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 01 Feb 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/802/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3368/en-US