Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 128
13. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 13. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families New York 18 December 1990 Entry into force : 1 July 2003 in accordance with UNIV-13https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-13&chapter=4&clang=_en
16. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 16. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance New York 20 December 2006 Entry into force : 23 December 2010 in accordance with article 39 1 which UNIV-16https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-16&chapter=4&clang=_en
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b
Aboufaied v. Libya
Aboufaied v. Libya CCPR/C/104/D/1782/2008 Communication number s : 1782/2008 Author: Tahar Mohamed Aboufaied Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Libya Submission date 05 Apr 2008 Date of decision 21 Mar 2012 Comment: The texts of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1782/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1364/en-US
Benaziza v. Algeria
Benaziza v. Algeria CCPR/C/99/D/1588/2007 Communication number s : 1588/2007 Author: Nedjma Benaziza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Algeria Submission date 13 Mar 2007 Date of decision 26 Jul 2010 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1588/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1485/en-US
CASE OF AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 61498/08 SHINER P. GBR 3/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 34 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD006149808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97575
CASE OF AL-SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 55721/07 PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERS GBR 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed estoppel non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed lack of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD005572107https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105606
CASE OF CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN C MPEANU v. ROMANIA 47848/08 COJOCARIU C. ROU 7/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Locus standi Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD004784808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145577
CASE OF DRĖLINGAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF DR LINGAS v. LITHUANIA 28859/16 N/A LTU 3/12/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nullum crimen sine lege Retroactivity Criminal offence Article 99 of the Lithuanian Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312JUD002885916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-191702
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 24384/19 44234/20 DOS M. FRA 9/14/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Locus standi Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219333
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY 4871/16 KALECK W. DEU 2/16/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD000487116https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208279
CASE OF HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY 27765/09 LANA A. G. SACCUCCI A. ITA 2/23/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0223JUD002776509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109231
CASE OF KLEIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KLEIN v. RUSSIA 24268/08 YAMPOLSKIY D. RUS 4/1/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 in case of extradition to Colombia Just satisfaction finding of violation sufficient Articles 21 2 and 46 2 and 3 of the Russian ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD002426808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98010
CASE OF KURT v. TURKEY
CASE OF KURT v. TURKEY 24276/94 N/A TUR 5/25/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 complaint in respect of applicant s son Violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0525JUD002427694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58198
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 N/A TUR 2/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 as regard the extradition proceedings No separate issue under Art. 6 as regard the other complaints Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60924
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 10865/09 45886/07 32431/08 POPESCU A. SFIRAIALA I. MATEI I. NACEA D. HARTNEANU D.O. ROU 9/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Six month period Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
CASE OF TRABELSI v. BELGIUM
CASE OF TRABELSI v. BELGIUM 140/10 CHATEAU A. BEL 9/4/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition the United ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0904JUD000014010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146372
CASE OF ĆWIK v. POLAND
CASE OF WIK v. POLAND 31454/10 ILASZ L. POL 11/5/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD003145410https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205536