Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1901 - 1920 of 2537
Miller et.al. v. New Zealand
Miller et.al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/119/D/2502/2014 Communication number s : 2502/2014 Author: Allan Brian Miller and Michael John Carroll Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country New Zealand Submission date 17 Feb 2014 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2502/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2433/en-US
Min-Kyu Jeong et al. v. Republic of Korea
Min Kyu Jeong et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/101/D/1642 1741/2007 Communication number s : 1741/2007 1642/2007 Author: Min Kyu Jeong et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 21 Sep 2007 Date JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1642-1741/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1637/en-US
Morrison (Everton) v. Jamaica
Morrison Everton v. Jamaica CCPR/C/63/D/635/1995 Communication number s : 635/1995 Author: Everton Morrison Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Jamaica Submission date 14 Jun 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 1998 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/63/D/635/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/352/en-US
Mustafa Onder v. Morocco
Mustafa Onder v. Morocco CAT/C/66/D/845/2017 Communication number s : 845/2017 Author: Mustafa Onder represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Morocco Submission date 17 Oct 2017 Date of decision 10 May 2019 JUTBCAT/C/66/D/845/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2589/en-US
Mwamba v. Zambia
Mwamba v. Zambia CCPR/C/98/D/1520/2006 Communication number s : 1520/2006 Author: Munguwambuto Kabwe Peter Mwamba Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Zambia Submission date 29 Jun 2005 Date of decision 10 Mar 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1520/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1559/en-US
N.A.E. v. Spain
N.A.E. v. Spain CEDAW/C/82/D/149/2019 Communication number s : 149/2019 Author: N.A.E. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Spain Submission date 10 Nov 2018 Date of decision 27 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/149/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3144/en-US
N.K. v. Norway
N.K. v. Norway CEDAW/C/65/D/74/2014 Communication number s : 74/2014 Author: N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Norway Submission date 27 Dec 2013 Date of decision 07 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/65/D/74/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3447/en-US
NACHOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
NACHOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 06/07/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Right to life: Killing of two Roma conscripts due to the unjustified use of fire arms by military police during their attempted arrest ineffectiveness of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3601
NETHERLANDS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NETHERLANDS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/NLD/CO/22 24 NULL 2021 11 16T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/NLD/CO/22 24 International Convention on Distr.: General 16 November 2021 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English UHRICERD/C/NLD/CO/22-24https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ee69bcd0-e54e-4fae-ad4f-7c2d9dc62e6b
Nasir v. Australia
Nasir v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012 Communication number s : 2229/2012 Author: Nasir Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2012 Date of decision 29 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3091/en-US
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006 Communication number s : 1535/2006 Author: Nataliya Litvin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 15 Jun 2006 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1593/en-US
Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/95/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 95 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 07 May 2018 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/95/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3444/en-US
O.N., D.P. v. Russian Federation
O.N. D.P. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017 Communication number s : 119/2017 Author: O.N. D.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Russian Federation Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2709/en-US
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
ORCHOWSKI v. Poland
ORCHOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/01/2010 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:20:29 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/ Conditions of detention: Structural problem of inadequate detention conditions particularly overcrowding aggravated by factors such as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39886
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography Concluding observations: El Salvador
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children child prostitution and child pornography Concluding observations: El Salvador CRC/C/OPSC/SLV/CO/1 NULL 2010 02 12T00:00:00 CRC OP SC Fifty third session 11 29 January UHRICRC/C/OPSC/SLV/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/89539107-6257-492f-84b0-23c6fcf61ead
Osmani v. Serbia
Osmani v. Serbia CAT/C/42/D/261/2005 Communication number s : 261/2005 Author: Besim Osmani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Serbia Submission date 17 Dec 2004 Date of decision 08 May 2009 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/42/D/261/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/68/en-US
PASQUINI v. San Marino (no. 2)
PASQUINI v. San Marino no. 2 SMR 08/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to the presumption of innocence. Even though the criminal proceedings against the applicant on charges of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57159
POEM and FASM v. Denmark
POEM and FASM v. Denmark CERD/C/62/D/22/2002 Communication number s : 022/2002 Author: POEM and FASM Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 08 Aug 2001 Date of decision 19 Mar 2003 Comment: This document JUTBCERD/C/62/D/22/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1758/en-US
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/PRT/CO/5 NULL 2023 03 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/PRT/CO/5 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 30 March 2023 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/PRT/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/11eef3eb-b3b9-4fc2-a8bc-1e56f8772ed3