Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 481 - 500 of 942
Government comments on the first report on Armenia
Government comments on the first report on Armenia ARM 2002 12 13 2003 07 08 APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its report on Armenia is dated 13 December 2002 and that any subsequent development is not taken into account. In ECRIARM-COM-II-2003-036-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ARM-COM-II-2003-036-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal PRT 2013 03 21 2013 07 09 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
Government comments on the fourth report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 2010 04 28 2010 06 15 Government comments on the report on THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix ECRIMKD-COM-IV-2010-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MKD-COM-IV-2010-019-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Croatia
Government comments on the second report on Croatia HRV 2000 12 15 2001 07 03 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Croatia. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIHRV-COM-II-2001-034-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=HRV-COM-II-2001-034-ENG
Government comments on the third report on the Russian Federation
Government comments on the third report on the Russian Federation RUS 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Russian Federation ECRI wishes to point out ECRIRUS-COM-III-2006-021-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=RUS-COM-III-2006-021-ENG
H.C. v. Jamaica
H.C. v. Jamaica CCPR/C/45/D/383/1989 Communication number s : 383/1989 Author: H.C. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 45 Country Jamaica Submission date 04 Mar 1989 Date of decision 28 Jul 1992 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/383/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/485/en-US
H.S. v. Denmark
H.S. v. Denmark CAT/C/71/D/792/2016 Communication number s : 792/2016 Author: H.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Dec 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/792/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3369/en-US
Hayden v. Sweden
Hayden v. Sweden CAT/C/21/D/101/1997 Communication number s : 101/1997 Author: Halil Hayden Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Sweden Submission date 07 Dec 1997 Date of decision 20 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/101/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/253/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Qatar, Nicaragua and Italy
The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Qatar Nicaragua and Italy. Ahmad Bin Abdullah Al Mahmoud Minister of State for Foreign Affairs of Qatar said Qatar paid significant attention to the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-qatar
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the Netherlands and South Africa
Human Rights Council MORNING 21 September 2012 Hears Address by Foreign Minister of Australia and Human Rights Minister of Burkina Faso Continues Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-netherlands
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review of Sweden, Grenada, Turkey and Kuwait
Human Rights CouncilMORNING/MIDDAY 26 June 2015 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Sweden Grenada Turkey and Kuwait.At the beginning of the meeting the President of the Council Joachim Ruecker UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2015/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-sweden
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review of Togo, Syria and Venezuela
Human Rights Council MORNING 16 March 2017The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Togo Syria and Venezuela. Kokouvi Agbetomey Minister for Justice and Relations with the Institutions of Togo thanked the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-togo-syria
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Venezuela, Iceland and Zimbabwe
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 15 March 2012 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Venezuela Iceland and Zimbabwe. Temir Porras Poneleon Vice Minister of the People s Ministry of External UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-venezuela
Human Rights Council holds general debate on Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights CouncilMIDDAY 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council during a midday meeting held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. In the discussion speakers said that the Universal Periodic Review was one of the great successes of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review
I.K. v. Denmark
I.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/125/D/2373/2014 Communication number s : 2373/2014 Author: I.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Feb 2014 Date of decision 18 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2373/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2915/en-US
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
ISAAK v. Turkey
ISAAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37298
ISAYEV v. Ukraine
ISAYEV v. Ukraine UKR 28/08/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in particular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31324
Independent Expert on minority issues
Report to HRC A/HRC/10/11/Add.3 from 8 September 2008 to 16 September 2008 18 February 2009 Independent Expert on minority issues Greece UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/10/11/Add.3 18 February 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS UNSPA/HRC/10/11/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f10%2f11%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Independent Expert on minority issues
Report to HRC A/HRC/16/45/Add.1 from 1 February 2010 to 12 February 2010 25 January 2011 Independent Expert on minority issues Colombia United Nations A/HRC/16/45/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 January 2011 Original: English Human Rights UNSPA/HRC/16/45/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f16%2f45%2fAdd.1&Lang=en