Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 521 - 540 of 942
Ltaief v. Tunisia
Ltaief v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/189/2001 Communication number s : 189/2001 Author: Bouabdallah Ltaief Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 30 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/189/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/163/en-US
Lumbala v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Lumbala v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/115/D/2214/2012 Communication number s : 2214/2012 Author: John Jacques Lumbala Tshidika Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission date 13 Aug JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2214/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2046/en-US
M.B. v. Canada
M.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/128/D/2957/2017 Communication number s : 2957/2017 Author: M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Canada Submission date 13 Feb 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2957/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2835/en-US
M. I. v. Sweden
M. I. v. Sweden CCPR/C/108/D/2149/2012 Communication number s : 2149/2012 Author: M. I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Sweden Submission date 07 May 2012 Date of decision 25 Jul 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2149/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1675/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
MERIT v. Ukraine
MERIT v. Ukraine UKR 30/06/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31316
Malika El Boathi v. Algeria
Malika El Boathi v. Algeria CCPR/C/119/D/2259/2013 Communication number s : 2259/2013 Author: Malika El Boathi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Algeria Submission date 05 Apr 2013 Date of decision 17 Mar 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2259/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2267/en-US
Min-Kyu Jeong et al. v. Republic of Korea
Min Kyu Jeong et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/101/D/1642 1741/2007 Communication number s : 1741/2007 1642/2007 Author: Min Kyu Jeong et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 21 Sep 2007 Date JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1642-1741/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1637/en-US
NEW ZEALAND: REPORT ON SPT VISIT
NEW ZEALAND: REPORT ON SPT VISIT CAT/OP/NZL/1 NULL 2017 02 10T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/NZL/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 10 February 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: English English French and UHRICAT/OP/NZL/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d72e29f6-898e-47f3-8956-03b4eedecf31
O.N., D.P. v. Russian Federation
O.N. D.P. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017 Communication number s : 119/2017 Author: O.N. D.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Russian Federation Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2709/en-US
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
OURANIO TOXO AND OTHERS v. Greece
OURANIO TOXO AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 20/01/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Freedom of association and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unjustified interference due to acts and omissions of domestic authorities in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22306
PANTEA v. Romania
PANTEA v. Romania ROU 03/09/2003 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13075
PERU: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PERU: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CED/C/PER/CO/1 NULL 2019 05 08T00:00:00 CED United Nations CED/C/PER/CO/1 International Convention for Distr.: General 8 May 2019 the Protection of All Persons English from Enforced Disappearance Original: Spanish Committee UHRICED/C/PER/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b8418fdf-ca4b-49d3-9b8f-2b2ea931bb53
PIU AND CIRSTENOIU v. Romania
PIU AND CIRSTENOIU v. Romania ROU 17/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: The case concerns the ineffectiveness of criminal investigation carried out between 2012 and 2014 into the death of the first applicant s husband Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46011
Pavlyuchenkov v. Russian Federation
Pavlyuchenkov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/105/D/1628/2007 Communication number s : 1628/2007 Author: Aleksei Pavlyuchenkov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Russian Federation Submission date 16 Jul 2007 Date of decision 20 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1628/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1245/en-US
Peirano Basso v. Uruguay
Peirano Basso v. Uruguay CCPR/C/100/D/1887/2009 Communication number s : 1887/2009 Author: Juan Peirano Basso Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Uruguay Submission date 05 May 2009 Date of decision 19 Oct 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1887/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1604/en-US
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (ETS No. 046)
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto ETS No. 046 046 Strasbourg 1963 09 COEETS No. 046https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 009)
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 009 009 Paris 1952 03 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Paris 1954 05 18T00:00:00 10 Ratifications. The COEETS No. 009https://rm.coe.int/168006377c
R.P.B. v. Philippines
R.P.B. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011 Communication number s : 034/2011 Author: R.P.B. represented by counsel Evalyn G. Ursua and Maria Karla L. Espinosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Philippines Submission date 23 May JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1875/en-US