Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 7677
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/25/D/149/1999 Communication number s : 149/1999 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 25 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Nov 1999 Date of decision 24 Nov 2000 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/25/D/149/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/206/en-US
A.S. v. Turkey
A.S. v. Turkey TUR 28/03/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to delays by the administration in paying additional compensation awarded for expropriation and substantial difference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28569
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/717/2015 Communication number s : 717/2015 Author: A.Sh. et al. represented by counsel Angela Stettler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 25 Nov 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/717/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2730/en-US
A.T. AND OTHERS v. Turkey
A.T. AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 17/10/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28793
A.T. v. Russian Federation
A.T. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/130/D/2517/2014 Communication number s : 2517/2014 Author: A.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Russian Federation Submission date 04 Aug 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2517/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3263/en-US
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013 Communication number s : 2291/2013 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 01 Oct 2013 Date of decision 13 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2128/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
ABBAS v. France
ABBAS v. France FRA 15/07/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:10:23 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab. Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: The sums EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32545
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ACCARDO v. Italy
ACCARDO v. Italy ITA 17/03/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Sustained impossibility for the applicants to obtain the assistance of the police to implement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44132
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: JAPAN
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: JAPAN CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7 8 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7 8 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English Committee UHRICEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7-8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d87f0f54-695a-4507-ba62-448fc975f8f2
AGGIATO v. Italy
AGGIATO v. Italy ITA 29/02/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42991
AGGUL AND AL v. Turkey
AGGUL AND AL v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicants complained i.a. about their eviction from their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28713
AGOSTINHO v. Portugal
AGOSTINHO v. Portugal PRT 03/10/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9549
AHMET TURAN DEMIR v. Turkey
AHMET TURAN DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 22/12/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Allegedly unjustified interference on account of criminal proceedings against the applicant under former Article 8 of the Law against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30514
AINSWORTH v. the United Kingdom
AINSWORTH v. the United Kingdom GBR 27/01/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings before the Court Marial due to its lack of impartiality and independence and absence of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2532
AIT SAID v. France
AIT SAID v. France FRA 16/01/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:09:01 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before administrative courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32369
AKA v. Turkey
AKA v. Turkey TUR 23/09/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26578