Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1541 - 1560 of 1858
Fourth Opinion on Poland
Fourth Opinion on Poland POL ACFC/OP/IV 2019 003 2019 11 06 2020 01 23 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2019 003 Fourth Opinion on Poland adopted on 6 November 2019 Summary Persons FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2019)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Op_Poland_EN
Fourth Opinion on Romania
Fourth Opinion on Romania ROU ACFC/OP/IV 2017 005 2017 06 22 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2017 005 Fourth Opinion on Romania adopted on 22 June 2017 Published on 16 February 2018 FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2017)005https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4_OP_Romania_rev_en
Fourth Opinion on the Czech Republic
Fourth Opinion on the Czech Republic CZE ACFC/OP/IV 2015 004 2015 11 16 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Strasbourg 28 June 2016 ACFC/OP/IV 2015 004 Fourth Opinion on the Czech Republic adopted on 16 FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2015)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_CzechRepublic_public_en
Fourth Opinion on the United Kingdom
Fourth Opinion on the United Kingdom GBR ACFC/OP/IV 2016 005 2016 05 25 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Strasbourg 27 February 2017 ACFC/OP/IV 2016 005 Fourth Opinion on the United Kingdom adopted FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2016)005https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_UnitedKingdom_en
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
G.M.N.F. v. Netherlands
G.M.N.F. v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/75/D/117/2017 Communication number s : 117/2017 Author: G.M.N.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Apr 2017 Date of decision 17 Feb 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/117/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3129/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) ALBANIA
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention ALBANIA ALB a14 a18 a20 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2017)13_Albania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2017)13_Albania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) PORTUGAL
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention PORTUGAL PRT a111a a13 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)16_Portugal_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)16_Portugal_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gallardo Martínez et al. v. Mexico
Gallardo Mart nez et al. v. Mexico CAT/C/72/D/992/2020 Communication number s : 992/2020 Author: Dami n Gallardo Mart nez on his own behalf and on that of his four minor children Yolanda Barranco Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country JUTBCAT/C/72/D/992/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3340/en-US
Gauthier v. Canada
Gauthier v. Canada CCPR/C/65/D/633/1995 Communication number s : 633/1995 Author: Robert Gauthier Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Canada Submission date 01 Jan 1995 Date of decision 07 Apr 1999 Comment: Exact date of submission JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/633/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/768/en-US
Georgopoulos, Georgopoulou and their seven children v. Greece
Georgopoulos Georgopoulou and their seven children v. Greece CCPR/C/99/D/1799/2008 Communication number s : 1799/2008 Author: Antonios Georgopoulos Chrysafo Georgopoulou and their seven children Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1799/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1629/en-US
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway NOR 2008 06 20 2009 02 24 Government comments on the report on NORWAY APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Norway ECRI ECRINOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Latvia
Government comments on the third report on Latvia LVA 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Latvia ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRILVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Ukraine
Government comments on the third report on Ukraine UKR 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Ukraine ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIUKR-COM-III-2008-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=UKR-COM-III-2008-004-ENG
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal CAT/C/36/D/181/2001 Communication number s : 181/2001 Author: Suleymane Guengueng et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Senegal Submission date 18 Apr 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2006 Comment: In JUTBCAT/C/36/D/181/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/116/en-US
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands CAT/C/63/D/719/2015 Communication number s : 719/2015 Author: H.A. and G.H. represented by counsel P.J. Schuller Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/719/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2745/en-US
H.L. v. Australia
H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Qatar, Nicaragua and Italy
The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Qatar Nicaragua and Italy. Ahmad Bin Abdullah Al Mahmoud Minister of State for Foreign Affairs of Qatar said Qatar paid significant attention to the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-qatar