Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 165
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
Follow-up report v. Denmark,Kazakhstan,Mexico,Netherlands,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Denmark Kazakhstan Mexico Netherlands Switzerland CAT/C/57/3 Communication number s : 580/2014 500/2012 441/2010 497/2012 544/2013 613/2014 569/2013 538/2013 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 57 Country Denmark JUTBCAT/C/57/3https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3598/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) PORTUGAL
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention PORTUGAL PRT a111a a13 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)16_Portugal_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)16_Portugal_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GUINEA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
GUINEA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/GIN/CO/3 6 NULL 2019 02 28T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/GIN/CO/3 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 28 February 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/GIN/CO/3-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ef672265-e188-4683-b952-2bb0da3b835c
Government comments on the fifth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fifth report on Portugal PRT 2018 06 19 2018 10 02 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-V-2018-035-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-V-2018-035-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Malta
Government comments on the third report on Malta MLT 2007 12 14 2008 04 29 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIMLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENG
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal CAT/C/36/D/181/2001 Communication number s : 181/2001 Author: Suleymane Guengueng et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Senegal Submission date 18 Apr 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2006 Comment: In JUTBCAT/C/36/D/181/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/116/en-US
H.B. v. Spain
H.B. v. Spain CRC/C/83/D/25/2017 Communication number s : 025/2017 Author: H.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Spain Submission date 12 Jul 2017 Date of decision 07 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/83/D/25/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2942/en-US
Halima Louddi v. Algeria
Halima Louddi v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2117/2011 Communication number s : 2117/2011 Author: Halima Louddi represented by Philippe Grant of the Swiss organization Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2117/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1920/en-US
Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review Working Group to hold thirty-ninth session in Geneva from 1 to 12 November 2021
Working Group to Review the Human Rights Records in 14 States GENEVA 27 October 2021 The thirty ninth session of the Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group will be held in Geneva from 1 to 12 November during which the next UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/11/human-rights-council-universal-periodic-review-working-group-hold-thirty
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Saudi Arabia, Senegal, the Congo and Nigeria
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 14 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Saudi Arabia Senegal the Congo and Nigeria. At the beginning of the meeting Harald Aspelund Vice President of the Human UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-saudi-arabia-senegal
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the Netherlands and South Africa
Human Rights Council MORNING 21 September 2012 Hears Address by Foreign Minister of Australia and Human Rights Minister of Burkina Faso Continues Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-netherlands
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review of Guinea-Bissau and Kiribati
Human Rights Council MIDDAY 1 October 2010 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Guinea Bissau and Kiribati. Cletche Sanha Legal Counsel with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Guinea Bissau said UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/10/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-guinea-bissau
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Ireland, Togo and Syria
Human Rights Council MIDDAY 15 March 2012 The Human Rights Council at its midday meeting today adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Ireland Togo and Syria.Gerard Corr Permanent Representative of Ireland to the United Nations Office at UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-ireland-togo
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of the Russian Federation, Cameroon and Cuba
Human Rights CouncilAFTERNOON 20 September 2013 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of the Russian Federation Cameroon and Cuba. Georgy Matyushkin Representative of the Russian Federation at the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2013/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-russian
J.H.A. v. Mauritania,Spain
J.H.A. v. Mauritania Spain CAT/C/41/D/323/2007 Communication number s : 323/2007 Author: J.H.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 41 Country Mauritania Spain Submission date 07 May 2007 Date of decision 11 Nov 2008 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/41/D/323/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/76/en-US
Jong-bum Bae et al. v. Republic of Korea
Jong bum Bae et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/128/D/2846/2016 Communication number s : 2846/2016 Author: Jong bum Bae et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 19 Sep 2016 Date of decision 13 JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2846/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2831/en-US
Lederbauer v. Austria
Lederbauer v. Austria CCPR/C/90/D/1454/2006 Communication number s : 1454/2006 Author: Wolfgang Lederbauer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Austria Submission date 27 Sep 2005 Date of decision 13 Jul 2007 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1454/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1385/en-US
M.B.S. v. Spain
M.B.S. v. Spain CRC/C/85/D/26/2017 Communication number s : 026/2017 Author: M.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Online limited session Country Spain Submission date 19 Jul 2017 Date of decision 28 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has JUTBCRC/C/85/D/26/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2749/en-US
M.B. v. Spain
M.B. v. Spain CRC/C/85/D/28/2017 Communication number s : 028/2017 Author: M.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Online limited session Country Spain Submission date 20 Jul 2017 Date of decision 28 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/85/D/28/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2750/en-US