Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 656
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.L. v. Spain
A.L. v. Spain CRC/C/81/D/16/2017 Communication number s : 016/2017 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Spain Submission date 15 May 2017 Date of decision 31 May 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/81/D/16/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2526/en-US
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
Ad hoc Report on Greece (Rule 34)
Ad hoc Report on Greece Rule 34 GRC 2019 12 06 2019 12 18 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Public Publication: 18 December 2019 Greco AdHocRep 2019 2 Ad hoc Report on GREECE Rule 34 Adopted by GRECO at its 84th Plenary Meeting Strasbourg 2 6 December 2019 I. GRECOGreco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIC
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Akhidenor et al. v. Canada
Akhidenor et al. v. Canada CAT/C/21/D/67/1997 Communication number s : 067/1997 Author: E.O. Akhidenor E. Ainabe R. Akhidenor J. Akhidenor K. Akhidenor and W. Akhidenor Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 21 Country Canada Submission JUTBCAT/C/21/D/67/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/241/en-US
Ali and Ali v. Norway
Ali and Ali v. Norway CCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017 Communication number s : 2926/2017 Author: Imran Ali and Bakhtaware Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Norway Submission date 04 Jan 2017 Date of decision 14 Jul 2022 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3677/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Anti-racism body urges Ireland to act on Traveller accommodation, hate speech and hate crime
Anti racism body urges Ireland to act on Traveller accommodation hate speech and hate crime IRL 2019 06 04 Fifth report on Ireland en fr Press Release 04.06.2019 Anti racism body urges Ireland to act on Traveller accommodation hate speech and hate crime ECRIIRL-PR-V-2019-287-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=IRL-PR-V-2019-287-ENG
Arredondo v. Peru
Arredondo v. Peru CCPR/C/69/D/688/1996 Communication number s : 688/1996 Author: Ms. Carolina Teillier Arredondo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Peru Submission date 17 Nov 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/688/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/882/en-US
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2017 04 27T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BGD/CO/1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 27 April 2017 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9a2678b7-7fac-43a9-a1f9-91fe5bdfa5fe
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BELIZE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELIZE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BLZ/CO/1/ADD.1 NULL 2018 12 11T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BLZ/CO/1/Add.1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 11 December 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee UHRICCPR/C/BLZ/CO/1/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/37e43ab6-ea7c-4b0c-a2ba-cfbd00e21638
BURKINA FASO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BURKINA FASO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/BFA/CO/1 NULL 2013 10 07T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/BFA/CO/1 International Convention on the Distr.: General 8 October 2013 Protection of the Rights of English All Migrant Workers and Original: French UHRICMW/C/BFA/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9d7d2df1-c493-4f47-a935-de8f9dcccd6b
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28680/06 MOLE N. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 8 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage award Section 23 6 of the Children Act 1989 238 354 444 110 451 268 376 425 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD002868006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97636
CASE OF A.T. v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF A.T. v. AUSTRIA 32636/96 N/A AUT 3/21/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321JUD003263696https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60334