Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1593
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A. A. C. v. Sweden
A. A. C. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/227/2003 Communication number s : 227/2003 Author: A.A.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Feb 2003 Date of decision 16 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/227/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/112/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.F. v. Sweden
A.F. v. Sweden CAT/C/20/D/89/1997 Communication number s : 089/1997 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Sweden Submission date 03 Sep 1997 Date of decision 08 May 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/20/D/89/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/237/en-US
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/AUS/CO/5 6 NULL 2019 11 01T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/AUS/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 1 November 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/AUS/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/565aabfe-16c4-47bc-9476-e15faeda599d
Achabal Puertas v. Spain
Achabal Puertas v. Spain CCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010 Communication number s : 1945/2010 Author: Mar a Cruz Achabal Puertas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Spain Submission date 02 Nov 2009 Date of decision 27 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1317/en-US
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Biomedical Research (CETS No. 195)
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Biomedical Research CETS No. 195 195 Strasbourg 2005 01 25T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the Signatories to Treaty ETS 164 Strasbourg 2007 09 01T00:00:00 5 COECETS No. 195https://rm.coe.int/168008371a
Angela González Carreño v. Spain
Angela Gonz lez Carre o v. Spain CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 Communication number s : 047/2012 Author: Angela Gonz lez Carre o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Spain Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1878/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8000/08 THE AIRE CENTRE GBR 9/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 in case of expulsion to Nigeria Sections 3 5 a and 5 of the Immigration Act 1971 Sections 82 1 82 2 j and k and 84 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000800008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106282
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390
CASE OF A.H. KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.H. KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6222/10 MALIK LEGAL SOLICITORS LTD. GBR 12/20/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Section 1 4 3 2 and 3 5 a of the Immigration Act 1971 Sections 82 1 and 84 of the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD000622210https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108113
CASE OF A.K. v. LATVIA
CASE OF A.K. v. LATVIA 33011/08 OLSENA S. LVA 6/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for private life Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD003301108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145005
CASE OF A.L. v. POLAND
CASE OF A.L. v. POLAND 28609/08 CICHON Z. POL 2/18/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life Article 86 of the Family Code Articles 80 1 and 81 1 of the Family and Custody ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218JUD002860908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140920
CASE OF A.N. v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF A.N. v. LITHUANIA 17280/08 GZIMAILA V. LTU 5/31/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531JUD001728008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163344
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE
CASE OF A.P. GAR ON AND NICOT v. FRANCE 79885/12 52471/13 52596/13 SCP GATINEAU FATTACCINI SCP THOUIN PALAT BOUCARD FOURNIER J. PIERRAT E. FRA 4/6/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD007988512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172913
CASE OF A.T. v. ESTONIA
CASE OF A.T. v. ESTONIA 23183/15 KULLERKUPP T. EST 11/13/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113JUD002318315https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187603