Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 141 - 160 of 10266
Andrés Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia
Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia CCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015 Communication number s : 2537/2015 Author: Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Colombia Submission date 11 Aug 2014 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2501/en-US
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013 Communication number s : 2273/2013 Author: Andrea Vandom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 07 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2496/en-US
Angela González Carreño v. Spain
Angela Gonz lez Carre o v. Spain CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 Communication number s : 047/2012 Author: Angela Gonz lez Carre o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Spain Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1878/en-US
Arboleda Saldarriaga v. Colombia
Arboleda Saldarriaga v. Colombia CCPR/C/87/D/1120/2002 Communication number s : 1120/2002 Author: Marco Antonio Arboleda Saldarriaga Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Colombia Submission date 04 Aug 2002 Date of decision 25 JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1120/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1282/en-US
Arshidin Israil v. China,Kazakhstan
Arshidin Israil v. China Kazakhstan CCPR/C/103/D/2024/2011 Communication number s : 2024/2011 Author: Arshidin Israil Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country China Kazakhstan Submission date 28 Jan 2011 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/2024/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1235/en-US
Aster v. Czech Republic
Aster v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1575/2007 Communication number s : 1575/2007 Author: Herman Aster Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Feb 2007 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1575/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1478/en-US
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
Aumeeruddy-Cziffra et al. v. Mauritius
Aumeeruddy Cziffra et al. v. Mauritius CCPR/C/12/D/35/1978 Communication number s : 035/1978 Author: Shirin Aumeeruddy Cziffra and 19 other Mauritian women Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 Country Mauritius Submission date 02 May 1978 JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/35/1978https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/319/en-US
B.A.C. v. Greece
B.A.C. v. Greece GRC 13/01/2017 00:00:00 04/04/2017 15:59:50 Case Description: The case concerned the failure by the Greek authorities to decide on an asylum application lodged by the applicant for more than twelve years. The Court held that the above EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46537
B. AND L. v. the United Kingdom
B. AND L. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/12/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to marry: Prohibition of marriage between a father in law and daughter in law by legislation unless both their former spouses had die. Article 12 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2850
B.B. v. the United Kingdom
B.B. v. the United Kingdom GBR 07/07/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of private life: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of the applicant s sexual orientation due to this indictment for committing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3029
B.K.M. LOJISTIK TASIMACILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Slovenia
B.K.M. LOJISTIK TASIMACILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Slovenia SVN 17/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful and disproportionate interference due to the confiscation of a transport company s lorry in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46761
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. v. Spain
B.S. v. Spain ESP 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and discrimination: Lack of effective investigation into allegations of racially motivated ill treatment inflicted by police agents. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5760
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 NULL 2017 05 29T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 29 May 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/BHR/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2b4b69f2-8805-4d8f-900f-73aa61bc578e
BAJIC v. Croatia
BAJIC v. Croatia HRV 13/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of an adequate prompt and effective investigation into the applicants claims that their relatives death resulted from medical malpractice. Article 2 in its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10133
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BAKAN v. Turkey
BAKAN v. Turkey TUR 12/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusals by administrative courts to grant legal aid on the ground that actions were ill founded or that applicants failed to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37358
BAKLANOV v. Russia
BAKLANOV v. Russia RUS 30/11/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the authorities failure to base confiscatory measures on a precise legal provision Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27554
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601