Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1381 - 1400 of 2396
Gabriel Osío Zamora v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Gabriel Os o Zamora v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/121/D/2203/2012 Communication number s : 2203/2012 Author: Gabriel Os o Zamora Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission date 25 JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2203/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2349/en-US
Gallego Díaz v. Spain
Gallego D az v. Spain CCPR/C/82/D/988/2001 Communication number s : 988/2001 Author: Mariano Gallego D az Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 82 Country Spain Submission date 28 Oct 1999 Date of decision 03 Nov 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/988/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1127/en-US
Gallimore v. Jamaica
Gallimore v. Jamaica CCPR/C/66/D/680/1996 Communication number s : 680/1996 Author: Lancy Gallimore Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Jamaica Submission date 29 Apr 1995 Date of decision 23 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/680/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/790/en-US
Gemma Beasley v. Australia
Gemma Beasley v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/11/2013 Communication number s : 011/2013 Author: Gemma Beasley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 29 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/11/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2142/en-US
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Gombert v. France
Gombert v. France CCPR/C/77/D/987/2001 Communication number s : 987/2001 Author: Philippe Gombert Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country France Submission date 24 Sep 1999 Date of decision 18 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/987/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1045/en-US
Government comments on the fifth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fifth report on Portugal PRT 2018 06 19 2018 10 02 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-V-2018-035-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-V-2018-035-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal PRT 2013 03 21 2013 07 09 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom GBR 2009 01 17 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on THE UNITED KINGDOM APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and ECRIGBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Belgium
Government comments on the third report on Belgium BEL 2003 06 27 2004 01 27 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Belgium ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIBEL-COM-III-2004-001-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=BEL-COM-III-2004-001-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Bulgaria
Government comments on the third report on Bulgaria BGR 2003 06 27 2004 01 27 Government comments on the n report on BULGARIA APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Bulgaria ECRI ECRIBGR-COM-III-2004-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=BGR-COM-III-2004-002-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Romania
Government comments on the third report on Romania ROU 2005 06 24 2006 02 21 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Romania ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIROU-COM-III-2006-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ROU-COM-III-2006-003-ENG
Government comments on the third report on “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
Government comments on the third report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Former Yugoslav Republic of ECRIMKD-COM-III-2005-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MKD-COM-III-2005-004-ENG
Groupe d’Intérêt pour le Matronyme v. France
Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007 Communication number s : 012/2007 Author: Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 44 Country France Submission date 26 May 2006 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1709/en-US
Gyan Devi Bolakhe et al. v. Nepal
Gyan Devi Bolakhe et al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/123/D/2658/2015 Communication number s : 2658/2015 Author: Gyan Devi Bolakhe Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Nepal Submission date 14 Nov 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2658/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2530/en-US
H.J.T. v. Netherlands
H.J.T. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/133/D/3004/2017 Communication number s : 3004/2017 Author: H.J.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 133 Country Netherlands Submission date 03 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Nov 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3004/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3151/en-US
H.K. v. Norway
H.K. v. Norway CCPR/C/112/D/2004/2010 Communication number s : 2004/2010 Author: H.K. represented by counsel Christian B. Hjort and later by John Chr. Elden and Anders Brosveet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Norway Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2004/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1898/en-US
HONDURAS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
HONDURAS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/HND/CO/6 8 NULL 2019 01 14T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/HND/CO/6 8 International Convention on Distr.: General 14 January 2019 the Elimination of All Forms English of Racial Discrimination Original: Spanish UHRICERD/C/HND/CO/6-8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9ccb11e2-7e5b-458a-b6d1-30cf7082d7c4