Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2981 - 3000 of 3218
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT POLAND
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT POLAND POL 2012 10 19 2013 01 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-4E-Final-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-4E-Final-Poland-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT RUSSIAN FEDERATION
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT RUSSIAN FEDERATION RUS 2017 10 18 2018 03 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2017-2-eng-Final-RussianFed-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2017-2-eng-Final-RussianFed-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT UKRAINE
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT UKRAINE UKR 2017 06 23 2017 08 08 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-9-Ukraine-ENGhttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-9-Ukraine-ENG
FOXLEY v. the United Kingdom
FOXLEY v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/09/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to interception of the applicant s correspondence including correspondence with his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2516
Fedotova v. Russian Federation
Fedotova v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/106/D/1932/2010 Communication number s : 1932/2010 Author: Irina Fedotova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Russian Federation Submission date 10 Feb 2010 Date of decision 31 Oct 2012 JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1932/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1272/en-US
Fifth Evaluation Round Evaluation Report Lithuania
Fifth Evaluation Round Evaluation Report Lithuania LTU 2021 12 03 2022 04 26 Adoption: 3 December 2021 Publication: 26 April 2022 Public GrecoRC5 2020 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top GRECOGrecoEval5-2020-1-Final-eng-Evaluation-Report-Lithuania-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5-2020-1-Final-eng-Evaluation-Report-Lithuania-PUBLIC
Fourth Opinion on Bulgaria
Fourth Opinion on Bulgaria BGR ACFC/OP/IV 2020 001Final 2020 05 26 2020 10 12 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2020 001Final Fourth Opinion on Bulgaria adopted on 26 May 2020 Summary FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2020)001Finalhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Op_Bulgaria_EN
Fourth Opinion on Kosovo*
Fourth Opinion on Kosovo SRBKOS ACFC/OP/IV 2017 001 2017 03 08 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2017 001 Fourth Opinion on Kosovo adopted on 8 March 2017 Summary Moderate progress has been FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2017)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Kosovo_en
Fourth Opinion on the Russian Federation
Fourth Opinion on the Russian Federation RUS ACFC/OP/IV 2018 001 2018 02 20 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Restricted ACFC/OP/IV 2018 001 Fourth Opinion on the Russian Federation adopted on 20 FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2018)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_RussianFederation_en
Fourth Opinion on the Slovak Republic
Fourth Opinion on the Slovak Republic SVK ACFC/OP/IV 2014 004 2014 12 03 ACFC/OP/IV 2014 004 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Fourth Opinion on the Slovak Republic adopted on 3 December 2014 FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2014)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_SlovakRepublic_EN
Franck Kitenge Baruani v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Franck Kitenge Baruani v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/110/D/1890/2009 Communication number s : 1890/2009 Author: Franck Kitenge Baruani represented by Anna Copeland SCALES Community Legal Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1890/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1804/en-US
G.H. v. Hungary
G.H. v. Hungary CEDAW/C/76/D/114/2017 Communication number s : 114/2017 Author: G.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Hungary Submission date 23 Feb 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/114/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3037/en-US
G.J. v. Lithuania
G.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/110/D/1894/2009 Communication number s : 1894/2009 Author: G.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Lithuania Submission date 26 Nov 2007 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1894/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1805/en-US
G.P. and G.P. v. Canada
G.P. and G.P. v. Canada CCPR/C/132/D/3016/2017 Communication number s : 3016/2017 Author: G.P. and G.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Canada Submission date 11 Aug 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3016/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3177/en-US
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/48/D/433/2010 Communication number s : 433/2010 Author: Alexander Gerasimov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 22 Apr 2010 Date of decision 24 May 2012 Comment: The decision JUTBCAT/C/48/D/433/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/26/en-US
Gintaras Jagminas v. Lithuania
Gintaras Jagminas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/126/D/2670/2015 Communication number s : 2670/2015 Author: Gintaras Jagminas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2670/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2795/en-US
Gnaneswaran v. Australia
Gnaneswaran v. Australia CCPR/C/133/D/3212/2018 Communication number s : 3212/2018 Author: Thileepan Gnaneswaran Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2018 Date of decision 27 Oct 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3212/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3155/en-US
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon
Gorji Dinka v. Cameroon CCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002 Communication number s : 1134/2002 Author: Fongum Gorji Dinka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Cameroon Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 17 Mar 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1174/en-US
Government comments on the first report on Turkey
Government comments on the first report on Turkey TUR 1998 11 28 1999 11 09 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Turkey ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRITUR-COM-I-1999-052-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-I-1999-052-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG