Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 64
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
Boimurodov v. Tajikistan
Boimurodov v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/85/D/1042/2001 Communication number s : 1042/2001 Author: Abdukarim Boimurodov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Tajikistan Submission date 24 Sep 2001 Date of decision 20 Oct 2005 Comment: Pursuant JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1042/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1198/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY 20261/12 CECH A. HUN 6/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Civil rights and obligations Determination civil Violation of Article 10 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002026112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163113
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY 20261/12 CECH A. HUN 5/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD002026112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144139
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS 43494/09 WIJLING R.S. NLD 11/6/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom to choose residence Sections 5 2 6 2 7 1 b and 17 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1106JUD004349409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177406
CASE OF GLOR v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF GLOR v. SWITZERLAND 13444/04 VON PLANTA STING D. CHE 4/30/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 14 8 Sections 2 et 4 paragraph 1 a of the federal military service exemption tax Act Sections 13 paragraph 2 a and 42 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0430JUD001344404https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92525
CASE OF GUÐMUNDUR ANDRI ÁSTRÁÐSSON v. ICELAND
CASE OF GU MUNDUR ANDRI STR SSON v. ICELAND 26374/18 VILHJ LMSSON V.H. ISL 12/1/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Tribunal established by law Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1201JUD002637418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206582
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY
CASE OF MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTS G v. HUNGARY 18030/11 FAZEKAS T. HUN 11/8/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD001803011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167828
CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE 27276/15 33692/15 BUSHCHENKO A. UKR 1/12/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD002727615https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222138
CASE OF TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIA 29474/09 KUKAITIS M. LTU 11/27/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Procedural aspect Code of Correctional Works Internal Regulations of Correctional Institutions 293 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD002947409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114770
CASE OF TEHRANI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF TEHRANI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 32940/08 41626/08 43616/08 ABADI D. TUR 4/13/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 3 in case of expulsion to Iran or Iraq Violation of Art. 13 3 No violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0413JUD003294008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98259
CASE OF VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA 35343/05 VILCINSKAS S. LTU 10/20/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nullum crimen sine lege Retroactivity Criminal offence Article 7 2 Criminal offence Pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD003534305https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158290
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador CCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013 Communication number s : 2244/2013 Author: Roberto Isa as Dassum and William Isa as Dassum Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ecuador Submission date 12 Mar 2012 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3094/en-US
Deisl v. Austria
Deisl v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002 Communication number s : 1060/2002 Author: Franz and Maria Deisl Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 17 Sep 2001 Date of decision 27 Jul 2004 Comment: The authors asked JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1128/en-US
Fifth Opinion on Spain
Fifth Opinion on Spain ESP ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final 2020 05 27 2020 10 15 ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final Published on 15 October 2020 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2020)002Finalhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_Op_Spain_EN
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Ireland, Togo and Syria
Human Rights Council MIDDAY 15 March 2012 The Human Rights Council at its midday meeting today adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Ireland Togo and Syria.Gerard Corr Permanent Representative of Ireland to the United Nations Office at UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-ireland-togo
Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights
Report to HRC A/HRC/20/23/Add.2 from 25 July 2011 to 5 August 2011 11 June 2012 Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights particularly UNSPA/HRC/20/23/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f20%2f23%2fAdd.2&Lang=en