Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 81 - 100 of 4230
Arshidin Israil v. China,Kazakhstan
Arshidin Israil v. China Kazakhstan CCPR/C/103/D/2024/2011 Communication number s : 2024/2011 Author: Arshidin Israil Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country China Kazakhstan Submission date 28 Jan 2011 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/2024/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1235/en-US
Arutyuniantz v. Uzbekistan
Arutyuniantz v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/83/D/971/2001 Communication number s : 971/2001 Author: Irina Arutyuniantz alleged victim s mother Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2000 Date of decision 30 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/971/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1156/en-US
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
Ashirov v. Kyrgyzstan
Ashirov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/120/D/2435/2014 Communication number s : 2435/2014 Author: Fakhridin Ashirov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 07 May 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2435/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2319/en-US
Ashurov v. Tajikistan
Ashurov v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/89/D/1348/2005 Communication number s : 1348/2005 Author: Rozik Ashurov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Tajikistan Submission date 07 Jun 2004 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1348/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1350/en-US
Askarov v. Kyrgyzstan
Askarov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/116/D/2231/2012 Communication number s : 2231/2012 Author: Azimjan Askarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 12 Nov 2012 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2231/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2112/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017 Communication number s : 3041/2017 Author: B.D.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 07 Nov 2017 Date of decision 19 Mar 2019 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2916/en-US
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B.L. (represented by Balmain for Refugees) v. Australia
B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011 Communication number s : 2053/2011 Author: B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1905/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 Communication number s : 641/2014 Author: B.N.T.K. represented by counsel Mai Greitz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/641/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2456/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BATALINY v. Russia
BATALINY v. Russia RUS 14/12/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the first applicant on account of his forced psychiatric treatment in the absence of an established medical need EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13974
BECKLES v. the United Kingdom
BECKLES v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/01/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair hearing in criminal proceedings since the judge at the applicant s trial left the jury with the option of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2624
BELLER v. Poland
BELLER v. Poland POL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts and bodies violations of Article 6 1 . The case of Wcis o and Cabaj also concerns EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17662
BELOUSOV v. Ukraine
BELOUSOV v. Ukraine UKR 07/02/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Details of this case together with status of execution can be found under the case of KAVERZIN http://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng i 004 31569 Status of Execution: Details of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32054
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985