Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7301 - 7320 of 7388
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/36/Add.3 from 7 July 2014 to 9 July 2014 10 June 2015 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Italy United Nations A/HRC/30/36/Add.3 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 June 2015 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirtieth session UNSPA/HRC/30/36/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f36%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/40/Add.3 from 15 May 2006 to 23 May 2006 9 November 2006 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Nicaragua UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/4/40/Add.3 9 November 2006 ENGLISH Original: SPANISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL UNSPA/HRC/4/40/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f40%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/7/Add.2 from 1 June 2005 to 15 June 2005 5 December 2005 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Canada UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2006/7/Add.2 5 December 2005 Original: ENGLISH COMMISSION ON UNSPE/CN.4/2006/7/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f7%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
State comment on Report A/HRC/29/28/Add.4 from 18 August 2014 to 27 August 2014 15 May 2015 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Azerbaijan United Nations A/HRC/29/28/Add.4 General UNSPA/HRC/29/28/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f29%2f28%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/18/32/Add.2 from 16 August 2010 to 20 August 2010 4 July 2011 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Equatorial Guinea United UNSPA/HRC/18/32/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f18%2f32%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.2 from 28 August 2006 to 1 September 2006 23 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ecuador UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.3 from 20 July 2009 to 24 July 2009 15 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination United States of America UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Wright v. Jamaica
Wright v. Jamaica CCPR/C/45/D/349/1989 Communication number s : 349/1989 Author: Clifton Wright Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1989 Date of decision 27 Jul 1992 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/349/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/423/en-US
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X, Y and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/55/D/530/2012 Communication number s : 530/2012 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Nov 2012 Date of decision 04 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/55/D/530/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2073/en-US
X, Y and others v. Sweden
X Y and others v. Sweden CAT/C/67/D/816/2017 Communication number s : 816/2017 Author: X Y and others Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Sweden Submission date 23 Mar 2017 Date of decision 02 Aug 2019 Comment: Views non violation. JUTBCAT/C/67/D/816/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2624/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/807/2017 Communication number s : 807/2017 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 27 Sep 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/807/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3372/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CCPR/C/126/D/3580/2019 Communication number s : 3580/2019 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Australia Submission date 25 May 2018 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/3580/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3304/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014 Communication number s : 2366/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 19 Mar 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2017/en-US
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010 Communication number s : 1961/2010 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 04 Jan 2010 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1952/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US