Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3299
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4%282021%293-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
5th Round Compliance Report on Denmark
5th Round Compliance Report on Denmark DNK 2021 09 22 2021 12 17 Adoption: 22 September 2021 Publication: 17 December 2021 Public GrecoRC5 2021 9 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoRC5(2021)9-eng-final-Denmark-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC5%282021%299-eng-final-Denmark-PUBLIC
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep%282018%291-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.A.I. and A.H.A. v. Denmark
A.A.I. and A.H.A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2402/2014 Communication number s : 2402/2014 Author: A.A.I. and A.H.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 27 May 2014 Date of decision 29 Mar 2016 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2402/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2120/en-US
A.B.H. v. Denmark
A.B.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015 Communication number s : 2603/2015 Author: A.B.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 08 Jul 2019 Comment: An individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2778/en-US
A.B. v. Finland
A.B. v. Finland CRC/C/86/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 051/2018 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Finland Submission date 27 Jun 2018 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/86/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2946/en-US
A.D. v. Spain
A.D. v. Spain CRC/C/80/D/14/2017 Communication number s : 014/2017 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Spain Submission date 17 Mar 2017 Date of decision 01 Feb 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/80/D/14/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2508/en-US
A.H.G. v. Canada
A.H.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011 Communication number s : 2091/2011 Author: A.H.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Canada Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1926/en-US
A.M. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo,France
A.M. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo France CAT/C/44/D/302/2006 Communication number s : 302/2006 Author: A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo France Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of JUTBCAT/C/44/D/302/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/72/en-US
A.N.A. v. Denmark
A.N.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015 Communication number s : 094/2015 Author: A.N.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Sep 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2656/en-US
A.P. v. Russian Federation
A.P. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008 Communication number s : 1857/2008 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 May 2008 Date of decision 28 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1326/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2014 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2425/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2015 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Jan 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2636/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
ABENAVOLI v. Italy
ABENAVOLI v. Italy ITA 02/09/1997 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: The Abenavoli group of cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before the administrative courts since the 1990s violations of Article 6 1 . Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28186
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669