Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 34
A.B.H. v. Denmark
A.B.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015 Communication number s : 2603/2015 Author: A.B.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 08 Jul 2019 Comment: An individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2778/en-US
A.B. v. Finland
A.B. v. Finland CRC/C/86/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 051/2018 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Finland Submission date 27 Jun 2018 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/86/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2946/en-US
A.N.A. v. Denmark
A.N.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015 Communication number s : 094/2015 Author: A.N.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Sep 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2656/en-US
Ali and Ali v. Norway
Ali and Ali v. Norway CCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017 Communication number s : 2926/2017 Author: Imran Ali and Bakhtaware Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Norway Submission date 04 Jan 2017 Date of decision 14 Jul 2022 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3677/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
CASE OF M.A. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF M.A. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 5115/18 SAVOVA I. BGR 2/20/2020 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Violation of Article 2 3 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0220JUD000511518https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201351
E.M.M.A. v. Sweden
E.M.M.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/960/2019 Communication number s : 960/2019 Author: E.M.M.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 03 Oct 2019 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/960/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3326/en-US
E.U.R. v. Denmark
E.U.R. v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2469/2014 Communication number s : 2469/2014 Author: E.U.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Oct 2014 Date of decision 01 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2469/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2156/en-US
Fifth Opinion on the United Kingdom
Fifth Opinion on the United Kingdom GBR ACFC/OP/V 2022 003 2022 12 08 2023 05 25 ACFC/OP/V 2022 003 Published on 23 May 2023 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2022)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_OP_UK_en
First Opinion on the Netherlands
First Opinion on the Netherlands NLD ACFC/OP/I 2009 002 2009 06 25 Strasbourg 17 February 2010 ACFC/OP/I 2009 002 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Opinion on the Netherlands Adopted on 25 June 2009 FCNMACFC/OP/I(2009)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_OP_Netherlands_en
Fourth Opinion on Austria
Fourth Opinion on Austria AUT ACFC/OP/IV 2016 007 2016 10 14 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2016 007 Fourth Opinion on Austria adopted on 14 October 2016 Summary Interethnic relations in FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2016)007https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Austria_en
Government comments on the first report on the Russian Federation
Government comments on the first report on the Russian Federation RUS 1997 11 28 1999 01 26 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Russian Federation. ECRI wishes to point out ECRIRUS-COM-I-1999-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=RUS-COM-I-1999-003-ENG
J.B. v. Switzerland
J.B. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/721/2015 Communication number s : 721/2015 Author: J.B. represented by counsel Boris Wijkstr m and Gabriella Tau Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/721/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2403/en-US
K.E.R. v. Canada
K.E.R. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2196/2012 Communication number s : 2196/2012 Author: K.E.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2196/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2312/en-US
Kesmatulla Khakdar v. Russian Federation
Kesmatulla Khakdar v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/112/D/2126/2011 Communication number s : 2126/2011 Author: Kesmatulla Khakdar represented by counsel Ms. Tsytlina and Mr. Golubok Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Russian JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2126/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1932/en-US
M.I. v. Sweden
M.I. v. Sweden CCPR/C/130/D/3246/2018 Communication number s : 3246/2018 Author: M.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Sep 2018 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3246/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3253/en-US
M.Y. v. Sweden
M.Y. v. Sweden CRPD/C/24/D/49/2018 Communication number s : 49/2018 Author: M.Y. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 24 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Mar 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/24/D/49/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3070/en-US
M.Z. v. Belgium
M.Z. v. Belgium CAT/C/67/D/813/2017 Communication number s : 813/2017 Author: M.Z. represented by counsel Wolfgang Kaleck European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Belgium JUTBCAT/C/67/D/813/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2627/en-US
Masih Shakeel v. Canada
Masih Shakeel v. Canada CCPR/C/108/D/1881/2009 Communication number s : 1881/2009 Author: Masih Shakeel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 24 Jul 2013 Comment: The texts of two JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1881/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1670/en-US
Q.A. v. Sweden
Q.A. v. Sweden CCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017 Communication number s : 3070/2017 Author: Q.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 30 Oct 2019 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2806/en-US