Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6221 - 6240 of 6787
TASE v. Romania
TASE v. Romania ROU 10/09/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: unlawful placement in detention on remand and lack of pertinent and sufficient reasons for extending detention on remand as well as lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13087
TAVLI v. Turkey
TAVLI v. Turkey TUR 09/02/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Impossibility for the applicant to prevail himself before the national courts of DNA tests proving that he was not the father of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5574
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
THAILAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
THAILAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/THA/CO/1 NULL 2016 05 12T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/THA/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 12 May 2016 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/THA/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8c980399-1baa-4127-a7e8-fb7c6e0faaa8
TIERCE v. San Marino
TIERCE v. San Marino SMR 03/12/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:41:24 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11198
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39501
TRAFIK OIL - 1 EOOD v. Bulgaria
TRAFIK OIL 1 EOOD v. Bulgaria BGR 18/05/2021 00:00:00 21/05/2021 14:55:48 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions and the absence of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57639
TRAPANI v. Italy
TRAPANI v. Italy ITA 12/01/2001 00:00:00 16/11/2016 16:06:29 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and 8 in the case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39202
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049
TUNISIA : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TUNISIA : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/TUN/CO/4 6 NULL 2021 09 02T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/TUN/CO/4 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 2 September 2021 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/TUN/CO/4-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/efbc37e1-f61f-487a-84fc-a79fe18705ae
TURKEY: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
TURKEY: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/TUR/1 NULL 2019 12 12T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/TUR/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 12 December 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/TUR/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/abe06be7-69f2-4a5b-9225-5dfe99ce1525
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/TKM/CO/2 4 NULL 2015 03 09T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/TKM/CO/2 4 Convention on the Distr.: General 10 March 2015 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/TKM/CO/2-4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e0c596af-a042-4d01-8b1f-62d507269d8d
TURKMENISTAN: OPSC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TURKMENISTAN: OPSC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/OPSC/TKM/CO/1 NULL 2015 03 10T00:00:00 CRC OP SC United Nations CRC/C/OPSC/TKM/CO/1 Convention on the Distr.: General 11 March 2015 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child UHRICRC/C/OPSC/TKM/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e1939b11-cf36-43c0-aefc-7b1e1956f0d8
TUVALU: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TUVALU: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/TUV/CO/2 5 NULL 2020 03 31T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/TUV/CO/2 5 Convention on the Distr.: General 31 March 2020 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/TUV/CO/2-5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f899d75f-ef32-40a3-b1ce-9cedef3bfefd
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband, Boris Shikhmuradov v. Turkmenistan
Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband Boris Shikhmuradov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/112/D/2069/2011 Communication number s : 2069/2011 Author: Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband Boris Shikhmuradov not represented by counsel Type of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2069/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1907/en-US
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
Tharu et al. v. Nepal
Tharu et al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011 Communication number s : 2038/2011 Author: Chhedulal Tharu Sara/Sarita Tharu Padam Tharu Sanchariya Tharu Birbal Tharu Thagani Tharu Bhagawati Tharu Tulsiram Tharu Phagani Tharu Mahango Tharu Parmeshwari Tharu JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1994/en-US
Tharu et al. v. Nepal
Tharu et al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011 Communication number s : 2038/2011 Author: Chhedulal Tharu Sara/Sarita Tharu Padam Tharu Sanchariya Tharu Birbal Tharu Thagani Tharu Bhagawati Tharu Tulsiram Tharu Phagani Tharu Mahango Tharu Parmeshwari Tharu JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2027/en-US