Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 7234
A.M.M. v. Switzerland
A.M.M. v. Switzerland CERD/C/84/D/50/2012 Communication number s : 050/2012 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jan 2012 Date of decision 18 Feb 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/84/D/50/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1799/en-US
A.M. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo,France
A.M. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo France CAT/C/44/D/302/2006 Communication number s : 302/2006 Author: A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo France Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of JUTBCAT/C/44/D/302/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/72/en-US
A.N.P. v. South Africa
A.N.P. v. South Africa CRPD/C/23/D/73/2019 Communication number s : 73/2019 Author: A.N.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country South Africa Submission date 19 Sep 2017 Date of decision 28 Aug 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/73/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3063/en-US
A.P. v. Russian Federation
A.P. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008 Communication number s : 1857/2008 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 May 2008 Date of decision 28 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1326/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A. R. A. v. Sweden
A. R. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/38/D/305/2006 Communication number s : 305/2006 Author: A. R. A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 38 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 30 Apr 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/38/D/305/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/100/en-US
A.R. v. Netherlands
A.R. v. Netherlands CAT/C/31/D/203/2002 Communication number s : 203/2002 Author: A.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/31/D/203/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/159/en-US
A.S.G.M. v. Denmark
A.S.G.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/121/D/2612/2015 Communication number s : 2612/2015 Author: A.S.G.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Denmark Submission date 13 May 2015 Date of decision 09 Nov 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2612/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2356/en-US
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
A.T.A. v. Switzerland
A.T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/31/D/236/2003 Communication number s : 236/2003 Author: A.T.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 31 Country Switzerland Submission date 23 Sep 2003 Date of decision 11 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/236/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/164/en-US
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015 Communication number s : 2567/2015 Author: A.U. and H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country New Zealand Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2233/en-US
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/37/2006 Communication number s : 037/2006 Author: A.W.R.A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jul 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/37/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1735/en-US
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: SWEDEN
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: SWEDEN CEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8 9 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8 9 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8-9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b1983f51-e09a-4ee8-b8bc-0445222180f2
AGEYEVY v. Russia
AGEYEVY v. Russia RUS 09/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: 5 violations of the right to respect for private and family life Article 8 of the applicants a married couple in the context of events which resulted in the removal of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14030
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AKA v. Turkey
AKA v. Turkey TUR 23/09/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26578
AKKUS v. Turkey
AKKUS v. Turkey TUR 09/07/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5460