Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 24
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon CCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016 Communication number s : 2764/2016 Author: Cyrille Gervais Moutono Zogo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Cameroon Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2360/en-US
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014 Communication number s : 2483/2014 Author: Vladimir Adyrkhayev Behruz Solikhov and the Religious Association of Jehovah s Witnesses in Dushanb Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3555/en-US
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY 20261/12 CECH A. HUN 6/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Civil rights and obligations Determination civil Violation of Article 10 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002026112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163113
CASE OF ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF ILA CU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 48787/99 N/A MDA RUS 7/8/2004 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect the Republic of Moldova ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD004878799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61886
CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY 16483/12 MASERA L.M. ZIRULIA S. ITA 9/1/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 f Expulsion Violation of Article 5 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0901JUD001648312https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157277
CASE OF KHODZHAMBERDIYEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHODZHAMBERDIYEV v. RUSSIA 64809/10 RYABININA Y. DAVIDYAN E. RUS 6/5/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 f Extradition No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD006480910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111180
CASE OF MANOLE AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF MANOLE AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA 13936/02 NAGACEVSCHI V. GRIBINCEA V. MDA 9/17/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Violation of Art. 10 Just satisfaction reserved Article 4 of Governmental Decision No. 502 1996 Article 13 2 of Law No. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917JUD001393602https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-94075
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753
CASE OF NIKOLAY FEDOROV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF NIKOLAY FEDOROV v. RUSSIA 10393/04 SAMORODKINA M. RUS 4/5/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 350 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD001039304 FORMER FIRST SECTION CASE OF NIKOLAY FEDOROV v. RUSSIA Application no. 10393/04 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 5 April 2011 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD001039304https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104285
CASE OF T.K. AND S.R. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF T.K. AND S.R. v. RUSSIA 28492/15 49975/15 YERMOLAYEVA N. RUS 11/19/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Kyrgyzstan 350 618 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215 THIRD SECTION CASE OF T.K. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198477
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA 56774/18 SIMAITIS R. LTU 6/13/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005677418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225220
Dergachev v. Belarus
Dergachev v. Belarus CCPR/C/74/D/921/2000/Rev.1 Communication number s : 921/2000 Author: Mr. Alexandre Dergachev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Belarus Submission date 28 Sep 1999 Date of decision 02 Apr 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/921/2000/Rev.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3208/en-US
Korneenko v. Belarus
Korneenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/105/D/1226/2003 Communication number s : 1226/2003 Author: Viktor Korneenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Belarus Submission date 05 Aug 2003 Date of decision 20 Jul 2012 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1226/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1432/en-US
M.I.A.P. v. Spain
M.I.A.P. v. Spain CCPR/C/131/D/2558/2015 Communication number s : 2558/2015 Author: M.I.A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 131 Country Spain Submission date 18 Dec 2014 Date of decision 15 Mar 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2558/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3488/en-US
Mursalov et al v. Azerbaijan
Mursalov et al v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/136/D/3153/2018 Communication number s : 3153/2018 Author: Rovshan Mursalov Fatima Balova Milena Makarenko Basti Rasulova Galina Fazliahmadova and Goderdzi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3153/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3681/en-US
O.N., D.P. v. Russian Federation
O.N. D.P. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017 Communication number s : 119/2017 Author: O.N. D.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Russian Federation Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2709/en-US
P.L. and M.L. v. Estonia
P.L. and M.L. v. Estonia CCPR/C/127/D/2499/2014 Communication number s : 2499/2014 Author: P.L. and M.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Estonia Submission date 19 Aug 2013 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2499/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2886/en-US
Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Latvia
Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Latvia LVA 2012 11 30 2013 01 31 G R E T A Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings GRETA 2012 15 Report GRETALVA-REP-1-2012-15-ENG-1https://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-REP-1-2012-15-ENG-1
Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Latvia
Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Latvia LVA 2016 12 02 2017 03 23 Secretariat of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings GRETA GRETALVA-REP-2-2017-2-ENG-1https://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-REP-2-2017-2-ENG-1