Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1041 - 1060 of 1368
Conclusions XIV-2 - Norway - Article 4-3
Conclusions XIV 2 Norway Article 4 3 NOR 04 03 000 30/11/1998 30/11/1998 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 3 Non discrimination between and women men with respect to remuneration The Norwegian report indicates that there has been little ESCXIV-2/def/NOR/4/3/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XIV-2/def/NOR/4/3/EN
Conclusions XV-1 - Portugal - Article 6-4
Conclusions XV 1 Portugal Article 6 4 PRT 06 04 000 31/03/2000 31/03/2000 Article 6 Right to bargain collectively Paragraph 4 Collective action The Committee takes note of the information contained in the Portuguese report. Meaning of collective action ESCXV-1/def/PRT/6/4/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XV-1/def/PRT/6/4/EN
Conclusions XV-2 - Pays-Bas - Article 1 of the 1988 Additional Protocol
Conclusions XV 2 Pays Bas Article 1 of the 1988 Additional Protocol NLD 20 00 000 31/12/2001 31/12/2001 Article 1 of the 1988 Additional Protocol Right to equal opportunities and equal treatment in employment and occupation without sex discrimination The ESCXV-2/def/NLD/20//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XV-2/def/NLD/20//EN
Conclusions XVI-2 - Pays-Bas - Article 4-3
Conclusions XVI 2 Pays Bas Article 4 3 NLD 04 03 000 30/06/2004 30/06/2004 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 3 Non discrimination between and women men with respect to remuneration The Committee takes note of the information contained in ESCXVI-2/def/NLD/4/3/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XVI-2/def/NLD/4/3/EN
Conclusions XX-1 - The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - Article 1-2
Conclusions XX 1 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Article 1 2 MKD 01 02 000 07/12/2012 07/12/2012 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 2 Freely undertaken work non discrimination prohibition of forced labour other aspects The Committee takes note of ESCXX-1/def/MKD/1/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XX-1/def/MKD/1/2/EN
Crippa et al. v. France
Crippa et al. v. France CCPR/C/85/D/993 995/2001 Communication number s : 995/2001 993/2001 Author: Gabriel Crippa Jean Louis Masson and Marie Joe Zimmermann Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country France Submission date 01 Sep JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/993-995/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1230/en-US
Crochet v. France
Crochet v. France CCPR/C/100/D/1777/2008 Communication number s : 1777/2008 Author: Roger Crochet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country France Submission date 28 Dec 2007 Date of decision 25 Oct 2010 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1777/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1605/en-US
Cunillera Arias v. Spain
Cunillera Arias v. Spain CCPR/C/102/D/1531/2006 Communication number s : 1531/2006 Author: Jes s Cunillera Arias Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Spain Submission date 27 Jul 2006 Date of decision 26 Jul 2011 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1531/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1594/en-US
D.T.T. v. Colombia
D.T.T. v. Colombia CCPR/C/107/D/1904/2009 Communication number s : 1904/2009 Author: D.T.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Colombia Submission date 18 Feb 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1904/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1513/en-US
D.Č. v. Lithuania
D. . v. Lithuania CCPR/C/134/D/3327/2019 Communication number s : 3327/2019 Author: D. . Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Lithuania Submission date 12 Sep 2018 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3327/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3147/en-US
DACTYLIDI v. Greece
DACTYLIDI v. Greece GRC 09/07/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Effective remedy and protection of property access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of an effective remedy to compel authorities to enforce administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15579
DEMIR AND BAYKARA v. Turkey
DEMIR AND BAYKARA v. Turkey TUR 12/11/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of association: Interference with the exercise by municipal civil servants of their right to form a trade union and to negotiate collective agreements EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5500
DIMITAR AND ANKA DIMITROVI v. Bulgaria
DIMITAR AND ANKA DIMITROVI v. Bulgaria BGR 12/05/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Lacking fair balance in deprivation of property annulment of property titles acquired under Communist regime without clear and foreseeable possibility to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14683
Damianos v. Cyprus
Damianos v. Cyprus CCPR/C/84/D/1210/2003 Communication number s : 1210/2003 Author: George Damianos Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Cyprus Submission date 12 Jun 2001 Date of decision 25 Jul 2005 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1210/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1155/en-US
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador CCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013 Communication number s : 2244/2013 Author: Roberto Isa as Dassum and William Isa as Dassum Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ecuador Submission date 12 Mar 2012 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3094/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Mental Disability advocacy Center (MDAC) v. Belgium: Complaint No. 109/2014
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Mental Disability advocacy Center MDAC v. Belgium: Complaint No. 109/2014 BEL 15 01 000 17 01 163 17 02 163 91 172 163 91 177 163 91 178 163 2017 10 16 2018 03 16 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en ESCcc-109-2014-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-109-2014-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Associazione Professionale e Sindacale (ANIEF) v. Italy, Complaint No. 159/2018
Decision on the merits: Associazione Professionale e Sindacale ANIEF v. Italy Complaint No. 159/2018 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 101 163 91 102 163 91 119 163 91 124 163 91 129 163 91 201 163 2022 03 22 ESCcc-159-2018-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-159-2018-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits; Confédération générale du travail (CGT) and Confédération française de l’encadrement-CGC (CFE-CGC) v. France, Complaint No. 149/2017
Decision on the merits Conf d ration g n rale du travail CGT and Conf d ration fran aise de l encadrement CGC CFE CGC v. France Complaint No. 149/2017 FRA 02 01 000 02 05 000 04 02 000 2021 05 19 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ ESCcc-149-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-149-2017-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL) v. Italy, Complaint No.158/2017
Decision on the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro CGIL v. Italy Complaint No.158/2017 ITA 24 00 163 2019 09 11 2020 02 11 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 11 September ESCcc-158-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-158-2017-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits : European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) v. Ireland, Complaint No. 100/2013
Decision on the merits : European Roma Rights Centre ERRC v. Ireland Complaint No. 100/2013 IRL 16 00 000 17 00 163 30 00 163 91 175 163 91 176 163 91 212 163 2015 12 01 2016 05 16 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux ESCcc-100-2013-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-100-2013-dmerits-en